Tennys Sandgren and Arthur Cazaux will square off in the quarter of the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:30 am on COURT A. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Cazaux who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Cazaux is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Cazaux -> 1.79
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.97
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Arthur Cazaux
There is no head to head record between Tennys Sandgren and Arthur Cazaux since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 265, Tennys reached the quarter after defeating Dan Added 2-6 7-62 6-4 and Benjamin Hassan 6-3 1-6 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Tennys defeated Hassan (6-3 1-6 7-66). During the match, Sandgren scored 86 points vs Hassan’s 84. Tennys was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sandgren scored 10 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Overall, Tennys Sandgren was quite effective on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Tennys broke Hassan once after converting 14% of his break points (1/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American has conceded 2 set in this competition to win 51% of the points he played.
Sandgren has positive record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (263-207). 2-1 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Sandgren has a compiled 151-110 record in the last years on hard.
Sandgren has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
Arthur Cazaux
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-11 | 12-5 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-29 | 31-13 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-14 | 14-3 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-19 | 16-4 | 22-11 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 9-3 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
Ranked no. 382, Arthur reached the quarter after defeating Keegan Smith 6-3 6-2, Omni Kumar 4-6 6-1 6-3, Giovanni Fonio 6-4 6-4 and Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-75 7-64 6-3.
In the 2nd round against Gunneswaran, Cazaux recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-64 6-3). During the match Cazaux scored 121 points vs Gunneswaran’s 103. Arthur was extremely aggressive to blast 58 winners.
About the serving games, Cazaux fired 8 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Arthur Cazaux was quite effective on serve to win 78% (58/74) of his 1st serve and 51% (21/41) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cazaux broke Gunneswaran 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cazaux started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
Arthur has an aggregate 4-0 win-loss record in 2023, 4-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 98 |
| Pts | 206-197 | 348-278 |
| Total Points | 403 | 626 |
| Winners | 85 | 159 |
| %Winners | 41% | 46% |
Sandgren played 2 matches while Cazaux competed in 4 matches. Cazaux started his run from the qualifications while Sandgren had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Tennys Sandgren lost 2 sets, while Arthur Cazaux surrendered 2 sets. Sandgren has played 4 set(s) less than Cazaux (6 vs 10). Therefore, Sandgren played 38 games less than Cazaux. Tennys scored 85 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The French player made 159 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 26 | 31 |
| Avg per match | 13 | 7.8 |
| 1st in | 112/183 | 200/309 |
| %1st in | 61% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 85/112 | 159/200 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 40/71 | 59/109 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 54% |
Sandgren recorded 26 aces (13 per match). Cazaux recorded 31 aces (7.8 per match). Sandgren won 76% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Cazaux won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Cazaux |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/20 | 12/28 |
| % Converted | 10% | 43% |
| Conceded | 10 | 18 |
| Saved | 6 | 15 |
| % Saved | 60% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 |
Sandgren broke his opponents twice with a 10% conversion rate. Sandgren surrendered his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Cazaux broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sandgren | ||||
| R1 Added |
R2 Hassan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 7-62 6-4 | 6-3 1-6 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 29 | 60 | |
| pts | 120-113 | 86-84 | 206-197 | |
| Total points | 233 | 170 | 403 | |
| Winners | 42 | 43 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 50% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 16 | 10 | 26 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 59/102 | 53/81 | 112/183 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 65% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 42/59 | 43/53 | 85/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 81% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/43 | 15/28 | 40/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 54% | 56% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Converted | 1/13 | 1/7 | 2/20 | |
| Converted % | 8% | 14% | 10% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 2/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 50% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Cazaux | ||||||
| Q1 Smith |
Q3 Kumar |
R1 Fonio |
R2 Gunneswaran |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-75 7-64 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 20 | 35 | 98 | |
| pts | 65-46 | 93-73 | 69-56 | 121-103 | 348-278 | |
| Total points | 111 | 166 | 125 | 224 | 626 | |
| Winners | 27 | 40 | 34 | 58 | 159 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 43% | 49% | 48% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 31 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 33/54 | 53/85 | 40/55 | 74/115 | 200/309 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 62% | 73% | 64% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 40/53 | 34/40 | 58/74 | 159/200 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 75% | 85% | 78% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 18/32 | 8/15 | 21/41 | 59/109 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 56% | 53% | 51% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/8 | 2/7 | 3/5 | 12/28 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 50% | 29% | 60% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 18 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 6/7 | 0/0 | 6/8 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 86% | – | 75% | 131% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWWWLW
WLLLLLLLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Marek GengelGengel (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
