Mariano Navone and Timo Stodder will face off in the 2nd round of the Tigre 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA DIEGO SCHWARTZMAN. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mariano Navone who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mariano Navone is the pick to win this match.
Mariano Navone -> 1.66
Timo Stodder -> 2.13
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mariano Navone vs. Timo Stodder
There is no head to head record between Mariano Navone and Timo Stodder since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mariano Navone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-15 | 0-1 | 25-11 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 40-21 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-25 | 0-1 | 44-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 40-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 23-8 | 4-2 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 248, Mariano got to the 2nd round after beating Valerio Aboian 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, Mariano had a good straight sets win against Aboian (6-3 6-2). During the match, Navone scored 66 points vs Aboian’s 44. Navone was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Navone wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Mariano Navone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Navone put 57% of his first serves in, winning 71% (25/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (11/26) on the 2nd serve. Mariano broke Aboian 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Navone has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 65% of his matches (151-81). 1-0 on clay in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Navone has an aggregate147-78 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Argentine has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tigre 2 Challenger
Navone has never competed in this tournament before.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 8-8 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 280, Stodder reached the 2nd round after beating Alexander Weis 7-5 3-0 ret..
In the 1st round against Weis, Stodder had a free pass after Weis retired on a 7-5 3-0 . scoreline.
Stodder has a composed 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Navone | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 |
| Pts | 66-44 | 54-36 |
| Total Points | 110 | 90 |
| Winners | 25 | 14 |
| %Winners | 38% | 26% |
Both Navone and Stodder played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Navone has played 1 set(s) less than Stodder (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Navone played 2 games more than Stodder. Navone scored 25 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Timo scored 14 winners (26%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Navone | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 22/42 |
| %1st in | 57% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 14/22 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 15/20 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 75% |
Navone didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Stodder also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Navone won 71% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Stodder won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Navone | Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/9 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 67% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 63% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 |
Navone broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. Navone conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Timo broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Navone | |||
| R1 Aboian |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 66-44 | 66-44 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 35/61 | 35/61 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 25/35 | 25/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/26 | 11/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Stodder | |||
| R1 Weis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 3-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-36 | 54-36 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 14 | 14 | |
| %Winners | 26% | 26% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 22/42 | 22/42 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 14/22 | 14/22 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 15/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWW
LWLWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Tigre 2 Challenger
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero (3-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (7-64 4-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-76 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Jurgen BriandBriand (5-7 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Yunseong ChungChung (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Evan ZhuZhu (6-1 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Timo StodderStodder – Alexander WeisWeis (7-5 3-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Valerio AboianAboian (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Titouan DroguetDroguet (4-6 6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Remy BertolaBertola (4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas FarjatFarjat – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Andrea CollariniCollarini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Timo StodderStodder (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
