![Prediction And Head To Head Diana Shnaider Vs. Robin Montgomery Rsjvb0ctzo Prediction and head to head Diana Shnaider vs. Robin Montgomery](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Diana-Shnaider-vs.-Robin-Montgomery-rSJVb0CTZo.jpg)
Diana Shnaider and Robin Montgomery will play each other in the qualifications of the Australian Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 6:00 pm on Court 14. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Robin Montgomery who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Robin Montgomery is the pick to win this match.
Robin Montgomery -> 1.87
Diana Shnaider -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Diana Shnaider vs. Robin Montgomery
This will be the 2nd time that Diana Shnaider and Robin Montgomery face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Montgomery (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Montgomery won 6-3 6-2 in the qualifications in the Midland back in 2022.
Diana Shnaider
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-13 | 13-7 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-22 | 14-13 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 58-17 | 11-4 | 46-11 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 8-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 105 (career-high), Diana reached the qualifications after beating Joanne Zuger 7-5 6-0.
In the qualifications, Diana had a good straight sets win against Zuger (7-5 6-0). During the match, Shnaider scored 68 points vs Zuger’s 48. Diana was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shnaider made 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Diana Shnaider lost the serve twice and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Shnaider put 57% of her first serves in, winning 72% (23/32) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. The Russian broke Zuger 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
Shnaider has a fantastic record in the last 5 years having won 75% of her matches (70-23). 1-1 on hard in 2023. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Shnaider has a composed12-5 record in the last 5 years on hard.
Diana has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
Robin Montgomery
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-13 | 5-3 | 12-7 | 2-1 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-22 | 11-11 | 10-8 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 36-16 | 23-12 | 4-2 | 9-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 7-9 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-6 | 9-3 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 218, Robin reached the qualifications after beating Maria Lourdes Carle 6-2 7-66.
In the qualifications, Robin had a good straight sets win against Lourdes Carle (6-2 7-66). During the match Montgomery scored 82 points vs Lourdes Carle’s 73. The American was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Montgomery bagged 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Robin Montgomery lost the serve once and she saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Montgomery put 70% of her first serves in, winning 68% (34/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Lourdes Carle 3 times after converting 21% of her break points (3/14).
The American has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Shnaider | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 21 |
Pts | 68-48 | 82-73 |
Total Points | 116 | 155 |
Winners | 23 | 34 |
%Winners | 34% | 41% |
Both Shnaider and Montgomery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Shnaider and Montgomery have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Shnaider played 3 games less than Montgomery. Shnaider scored 23 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Montgomery managed to score 34 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Shnaider | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 2 |
Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
1st in | 32/56 | 50/71 |
%1st in | 57% | 70% |
1st pts | 23/32 | 34/50 |
%1st pts | 72% | 68% |
2nd pts | 12/24 | 13/21 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 62% |
Shnaider fired 2 aces . Montgomery bagged 2 aces . Shnaider won 72% points on her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Montgomery won 68% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Shnaider | Montgomery |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 3 |
Converted | 6/11 | 3/14 |
% Converted | 55% | 21% |
Conceded | 4 | 4 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 50% | 75% |
Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Diana broke her opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Russian conceded her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. Robin broke her opponent 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. Robin conceded her serve once and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded.
Shnaider | |||
Q1 Zuger |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 68-48 | 68-48 | |
Total points | 116 | 116 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/56 | 32/56 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Montgomery | |||
Q1 Lourdes |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 82-73 | 82-73 | |
Total points | 155 | 155 | |
Winners | 34 | 34 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 50/71 | 50/71 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 34/50 | 34/50 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/14 | 3/14 | |
Converted % | 21% | 21% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores – Australian Open
- Dan Alexandru TomescuAlexandru Tomescu – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (7-64 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bogdan Ionut ApostolIonut Apostol – Luca George TatomirGeorge Tatomir (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Calin MandaManda – Jiri VachtlVachtl (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alycia ParksParks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Nao HibinoHibino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Sachia VickeryVickery (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sophie ChangChang – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Na-Lae HanHan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Kayla DayDay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliona BolsovaBolsova – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Misaki DoiDoi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandra CadantuCadantu – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Asia MuhammadMuhammad (1-0) – H2H and prediction