Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Nao Hibino who should win in 3 sets.
Nao Hibino -> 1.61
Mirjam Bjorklund -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Nao Hibino vs. Mirjam Bjorklund
There is no head to head record between Nao Hibino and Mirjam Bjorklund since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Nao Hibino
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26-25 | 15-12 | 10-11 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 27-32 | 21-21 | 2-7 | 2-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-30 | 26-19 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 26-19 | 7-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 7-21 | 1-9 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 139, Hibino reached the qualifications after beating Louisa Chirico 7-63 2-6 7-65.
In the qualifications, Hibino defeated Chirico (7-63 2-6 7-65).During the match, Hibino scored less points (5) than Chirico. In fact, the world no. 139 won 107 points vs Chirico’s. That means that Hibino was more focused during the important points. The Japanese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hibino made 5 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Nao Hibino lost the serve 5 times and she saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Hibino put 73% of her first serves in, winning 67% (55/82) of the points behind her 1st serve and 39% (12/31) on the 2nd serve. Nao broke Chirico 3 times after converting 38% of her break points (3/8).
Hibino has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of her matches (271-227). 3-1 on hard in 2023. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Hibino has an aggregate 202-154 match record in the last years on hard.
The Japanese has a compiled 3-1 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
Mirjam Bjorklund
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-17 | 11-9 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 5-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-22 | 9-8 | 15-6 | 7-6 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-20 | 10-10 | 18-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 151, Mirjam reached the qualifications after beating Ekaterina Reyngold 7-5 6-1.
In the qualifications, Mirjam had a good straight sets win against Reyngold (7-5 6-1). During the match Bjorklund scored 69 points vs Reyngold’s 49. Mirjam was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Bjorklund scored 2 aces and she was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mirjam Bjorklund was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (32/42) of her 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Swede broke Reyngold 3 times after converting 43% of her break points (3/7).
Mirjam has an overall 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the Australian Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hibino | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 19 |
| Pts | 107-112 | 69-49 |
| Total Points | 219 | 118 |
| Winners | 55 | 32 |
| %Winners | 51% | 46% |
Both Hibino and Bjorklund played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nao Hibino dropped 1 set while Mirjam Bjorklund hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Hibino has played 1 set more than Bjorklund (3 vs 2). Therefore, Hibino played 15 games more than Bjorklund. Hibino scored 55 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Bjorklund bagged 32 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hibino | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
| 1st in | 82/113 | 42/62 |
| %1st in | 73% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 55/82 | 32/42 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 12/31 | 12/20 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 60% |
Hibino bagged 5 aces . Bjorklund recorded 2 aces . Hibino won 67% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Bjorklund won 76% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hibino | Bjorklund |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 38% | 43% |
| Conceded | 13 | 2 |
| Saved | 8 | 2 |
| % Saved | 62% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Hibino broke her opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Hibino conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 62% of the break points that she conceded. Bjorklund broke her opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Bjorklund was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Hibino | |||
| Q1 Chirico | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 2-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 107-112 | 107-112 | |
| Total points | 219 | 219 | |
| Winners | 55 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 82/113 | 82/113 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 55/82 | 55/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/31 | 12/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/13 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 62% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Bjorklund | |||
| Q1 Reyngold | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 69-49 | 69-49 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/62 | 42/62 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 32/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores – Australian Open
- Calin MandaManda – Jiri VachtlVachtl (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dan Alexandru TomescuAlexandru Tomescu – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (7-64 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bogdan Ionut ApostolIonut Apostol – Luca George TatomirGeorge Tatomir (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alycia ParksParks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katherine SebovSebov – Priscilla HonHon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Astra SharmaSharma – Simona WaltertWaltert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Jessika PonchetPonchet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Elizabeth MandlikMandlik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina BucsaBucsa – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Nao HibinoHibino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Sachia VickeryVickery (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucrezia StefaniniStefanini – Rebeka MasarovaMasarova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sophie ChangChang – Elina AvanesyanAvanesyan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Su Jeong JangJeong Jang – Yuriko MiyazakiMiyazaki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Na-Lae HanHan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – Kayla DayDay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliona BolsovaBolsova – Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Despina PapamichailPapamichail – Olga DanilovicDanilovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carol ZhaoZhao – Clara BurelBurel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Nigina AbduraimovaAbduraimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica Bouzas ManeiroBouzas Maneiro – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria SnigurSnigur – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura PigossiPigossi – Misaki DoiDoi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Destanee AiavaAiava – Arianne HartonoHartono (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandra CadantuCadantu – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Asia MuhammadMuhammad (1-0) – H2H and prediction