Beibit Zhukayev and Jason Jung will play each other in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT B. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.3
Beibit Zhukayev -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Beibit Zhukayev vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Beibit Zhukayev and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Beibit Zhukayev
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-1 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-30 | 19-16 | 1-3 | 11-8 | 2-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 43-30 | 33-21 | 1-2 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 13-10 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 313, Beibit got to the 2nd round after defeating Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 7-62 7-65.
In the 1st round, Zhukayev had a good straight sets win against Trongcharoenchaikul (7-62 7-65). During the match, Zhukayev scored 86 points vs Trongcharoenchaikul’s 77. The Kazakhstani was extremely aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Zhukayev scored 16 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Beibit Zhukayev was very effective on serve to win 87% (46/53) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match.
Zhukayev has a winning match record in the last 6 years having won 52% of his matches (102-94). 1-1 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Zhukayev has an overall71-49 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Zhukayev has an aggregate 1-1 win-loss record in 2023, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 396, Jason got to the 2nd round after beating Dominik Palan 6-4 6-1, Stuart Parker 6-3 7-5 and Sho Shimabukuro 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jason had a good straight sets win against Parker (6-3 7-5). During the match Jung scored 79 points vs Parker’s 67. The Chinese was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Jung bagged 2 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jason Jung lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 69% of his first serves in, winning 66% (35/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (15/24) on the 2nd serve. Jung broke Parker 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Jason has a compiled 2-0 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Zhukayev | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 55 |
| Pts | 86-77 | 201-144 |
| Total Points | 163 | 345 |
| Winners | 46 | 88 |
| %Winners | 53% | 44% |
Zhukayev played 1 match while Jung competed in 3 matches. Jung started his run from the qualifications while Zhukayev had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Zhukayev has played 4 set(s) less than Jung (2 vs 6). Therefore, Zhukayev played 29 games less than Jung. The Kazakhstani scored 46 winners (53% of the total points). On the other side, Jung scored 88 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Zhukayev | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 16 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 53/82 | 120/169 |
| %1st in | 65% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 46/53 | 88/120 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 30/49 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 61% |
Zhukayev made 16 aces . Jung recorded 8 aces (2.7 per match). Zhukayev won 87% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Zhukayev | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 11 |
| Converted | 0/4 | 11/21 |
| % Converted | 0% | 52% |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 6 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Kazakhstani hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Beibit quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points without even conceding a single break point. Jason broke his opponents 11 times with a 52% conversion rate. Jung conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Zhukayev | |||
| R1 Trongcharoenchaikul |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 86-77 | 86-77 | |
| Total points | 163 | 163 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 53/82 | 53/82 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 46/53 | 46/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/29 | 15/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/4 | 0/4 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Jung | ||||
| Q1 Palan |
Q3 Parker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 38 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 79-67 | 137-102 | |
| Total points | 93 | 146 | 239 | |
| Winners | 25 | 35 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 53/77 | 81/116 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 69% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 35/53 | 60/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 66% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 15/24 | 22/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/10 | 7/16 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 30% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWLLWW
LWWWLW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-75 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Henri SquireSquire (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Arthur CazauxCazaux – Giovanni FonioFonio (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Kacper ZukZuk (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Billy HarrisHarris (6-1 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Alafia AyeniAyeni (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Palaphoom KovapituktedKovapitukted (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Dan AddedAdded (2-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (7-62 7-65) – See score progression
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-4 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (6-7(5) 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Kasidit SamrejSamrej (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Lloyd HarrisHarris (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Valentin RoyerRoyer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
