Tommy Paul and Jack Draper will square off in the 2nd round of the Adelaide International 2 for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Draper who should win in 3 sets.
Jack Draper -> 1.8
Tommy Paul -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tommy Paul vs. Jack Draper
There is no head to head record between Tommy Paul and Jack Draper since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Tommy Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29-13 | 13-6 | 12-4 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 45-20 | 17-12 | 10-4 | 8-2 | 10-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 29-13 | 5-6 | 3-5 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-27 | 21-12 | 2-6 | 9-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-23 | 12-12 | 9-7 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 35, Paul got to the 2nd round after defeating Christopher O Connell 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Tommy had a good straight sets win against O Connell (6-4 7-5). During the match, Paul scored 70 points vs O Connell’s 53. Tommy was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Paul scored 6 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Tommy Paul was quite effective on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 78% (14/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Paul broke O Connell twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Paul has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (305-176). 1-0 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Paul has an aggregate147-88 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
The American has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Jack Draper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30-9 | 14-3 | 12-4 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 39-22 | 19-10 | 5-7 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 15-8 | 3-3 | 16-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-19 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 26-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-16 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 40 (career-high), Draper got to the 2nd round after beating Lorenzo Sonego 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Jack had a good straight sets win against Sonego (6-4 6-2). During the match Draper scored 58 points vs Sonego’s 36. Jack was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Draper made 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Jack Draper was exceptionally effective on serve to win 78% (21/27) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Draper broke Sonego 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Brit has a composed 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Paul | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 18 |
| Pts | 70-53 | 58-36 |
| Total Points | 123 | 94 |
| Winners | 32 | 21 |
| %Winners | 46% | 36% |
Both Paul and Draper played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Paul and Draper have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Paul played 4 games more than Draper. The American scored 32 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Draper fired 21 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Paul | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 39/57 | 27/44 |
| %1st in | 68% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 21/27 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 14/18 | 12/17 |
| %2nd pts | 78% | 71% |
Paul made 6 aces . Draper blasted 2 aces . Paul won 82% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Draper won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Paul | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Paul broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The American quite strong on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jack conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Paul | |||
| R1 O | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-53 | 70-53 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/57 | 39/57 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/18 | 14/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Draper | |||
| R1 Sonego | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 58-36 | 58-36 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/44 | 27/44 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 21/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Adelaide
- Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan – Nicolas Barrientos/Ariel BeharBarrientos/Ariel Behar (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-6 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Kyle EdmundEdmund (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-0 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Daniel EvansEvans (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-6 6-3 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-6 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-2) – H2H and prediction