Alejandro Davidovich Fokina and John Millman will square off in the 2nd round of the Adelaide International 2 for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on SHOWCOURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alejandro Davidovich Fokina who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alejandro Davidovich Fokina is the pick to win this match.
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina -> 1.33
John Millman -> 3.32
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs. John Millman
This will be the 2nd time that Alejandro Davidovich Fokina and John Millman play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Davidovich Fokina (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Davidovich Fokina won 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 in the 2nd round in Tokyo back in 2021.
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-12 | 6-5 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-28 | 18-11 | 9-8 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-26 | 7-9 | 11-8 | 0-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-25 | 4-6 | 16-7 | 9-10 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-13 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 32, Alejandro got to the 2nd round after beating Brandon Nakashima 6-2 7-63.
In the 1st round, Davidovich Fokina had a good straight sets win against Nakashima (6-2 7-63). During the match, Davidovich Fokina scored 75 points vs Nakashima’s 60. Davidovich Fokina was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Davidovich Fokina made 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Alejandro Davidovich Fokina was extremely effective on serve to win 82% (37/45) of his 1st serve and 60% (15/25) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Alejandro broke Nakashima twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Davidovich Fokina has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (210-144). 1-0 on hard in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Davidovich Fokina has a compiled85-50 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Alejandro has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Alejandro has never competed in this tournament before.
John Millman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 5-5 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-27 | 13-15 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-27 | 6-9 | 7-7 | 8-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 18-13 | 10-6 | 1-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 148, Millman reached the 2nd round after beating Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-2 6-2, Christopher O Connell 6-3 7-67 and Albert Ramos-Vinolas 4-6 6-3 7-66.
In the 1st round against Ramos-Vinolas, Millman recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-66).During the match Millman scored less points (2) than Ramos-Vinolas. In fact, the world no. 32 won 100 points vs Ramos-Vinolas’s. That means that Millman was more focused during the important points. Millman was exceptionally aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Millman made 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. John Millman lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Millman put 71% of his first serves in, winning 69% (53/77) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (15/32) on the 2nd serve. John broke Ramos-Vinolas 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Millman has a compiled 3-1 win-loss record in 2023, 3-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Adelaide
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Davidovich Fokina | Millman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 70 |
| Pts | 75-60 | 236-192 |
| Total Points | 135 | 428 |
| Winners | 37 | 114 |
| %Winners | 49% | 48% |
Davidovich Fokina played 1 match while Millman competed in 3 matches. Millman started his run from the qualifications while Davidovich Fokina had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, John Millman dropped 1 set while Alejandro Davidovich Fokina hasn’t conceded a set so far. Davidovich Fokina has played 5 set(s) less than Millman (2 vs 7). Therefore, Davidovich Fokina played 49 games less than Millman. The Spaniard scored 37 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, John fired 114 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Davidovich Fokina | Millman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 45/70 | 154/224 |
| %1st in | 64% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 114/154 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 40/70 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 57% |
Davidovich Fokina made 4 aces . Millman bagged 17 aces (5.7 per match). Davidovich Fokina won 82% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Millman won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Davidovich Fokina | Millman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 9 |
| Converted | 2/3 | 9/19 |
| % Converted | 67% | 47% |
| Conceded | 5 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 7 |
| % Saved | 100% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
Davidovich Fokina broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. The Spaniard pretty effective on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. Millman broke his opponents 9 times with a 47% conversion rate. John conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Davidovich Fokina | |||
| R1 Nakashima |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-60 | 75-60 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/70 | 45/70 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/45 | 37/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/25 | 15/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Millman | |||||
| Q1 Zapata Miralles |
Q3 O |
R1 Ramos-Vinolas |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-3 7-67 | 4-6 6-3 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 32 | 70 | |
| pts | 57-28 | 79-62 | 100-102 | 236-192 | |
| Total points | 85 | 141 | 202 | 428 | |
| Winners | 21 | 40 | 53 | 114 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 51% | 53% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 7 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/41 | 50/74 | 77/109 | 154/224 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 68% | 71% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 21/27 | 40/50 | 53/77 | 114/154 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 80% | 69% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 15/24 | 15/32 | 40/70 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 63% | 47% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 1/3 | 3/9 | 9/19 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 33% | 33% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2/2 | 3/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 50% | 217% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWLLLWL
LW Tennis Scores in Adelaide
- Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan – Nicolas Barrientos/Ariel BeharBarrientos/Ariel Behar (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-6 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Tommy PaulPaul – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Kyle EdmundEdmund (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (6-0 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Daniel EvansEvans (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jack DraperDraper – Lorenzo SonegoSonego (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- John MillmanMillman – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (4-6 6-3 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (4-6 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikael YmerYmer – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-4 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Mikael YmerYmer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Jack DraperDraper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-2) – H2H and prediction
