Carlos Sanchez Jover and Christian Langmo will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Tigre 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Carlos Sanchez Jover who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Carlos Sanchez Jover is the pick to win this match.
Carlos Sanchez Jover -> 1.21
Christian Langmo -> 4.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carlos Sanchez Jover vs. Christian Langmo
There is no head to head record between Carlos Sanchez Jover and Christian Langmo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Carlos Sanchez Jover
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 18-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-31 | 7-4 | 44-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-29 | 4-9 | 30-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 4-3 | 48-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-11 | 1-3 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 403, Sanchez Jover reached the qualifications after defeating Mateus Alves 6-3 7-64.
In the qualifications, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Alves (6-3 7-64). During the match, Sanchez Jover scored 70 points vs Alves’s 59. Sanchez Jover was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sanchez Jover scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Carlos Sanchez Jover lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Sanchez Jover put 68% of his first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 77% (17/22) on the 2nd serve. Sanchez Jover broke Alves twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Sanchez Jover has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (171-108). 4-1 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sanchez Jover has an overall155-88 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Spaniard has a composed 4-1 win-loss record in 2023, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tigre 2 Challenger
Christian Langmo
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-18 | 18-13 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-31 | 30-23 | 5-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-24 | 15-16 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-25 | 40-19 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 512, Langmo got to the qualifications after defeating Jorge Brian Panta Herreros 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Brian Panta Herreros, Langmo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Langmo scored 101 points vs Brian Panta Herreros’s 91. Langmo was extremely aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Langmo recorded 12 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Christian Langmo lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Langmo put 54% of his first serves in, winning 70% (37/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (25/45) on the 2nd serve. Christian broke Brian Panta Herreros 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The American has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sanchez Jover | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 |
| Pts | 70-59 | 101-91 |
| Total Points | 129 | 192 |
| Winners | 32 | 37 |
| %Winners | 46% | 37% |
Both Sanchez Jover and Langmo played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Christian Langmo dropped 1 set while Carlos Sanchez Jover hasn’t lost a set so far. Sanchez Jover has played 1 set(s) less than Langmo (2 vs 3). Therefore, Sanchez Jover played 7 games less than Langmo. Carlos scored 32 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 37 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sanchez Jover | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 12 |
| 1st in | 47/69 | 53/98 |
| %1st in | 68% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 37/53 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 17/22 | 25/45 |
| %2nd pts | 77% | 56% |
Sanchez Jover made 1 ace . Langmo also scored 12 aces . Sanchez Jover won 68% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 77% of the points. On the other side, Langmo won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sanchez Jover | Langmo |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 44% |
| Conceded | 2 | 8 |
| Saved | 1 | 5 |
| % Saved | 50% | 63% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
The Spaniard broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Sanchez Jover surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Christian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sanchez Jover | |||
| Q1 Alves |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 70-59 | 70-59 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/69 | 47/69 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/22 | 17/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Langmo | |||
| Q1 Brian Panta Herreros |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 101-91 | 101-91 | |
| Total points | 192 | 192 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 53/98 | 53/98 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 37/53 | 37/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLLWLLWW
LWWLWLWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin CuevasCuevas – Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla – Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Ignacio LonderoIgnacio Londero – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Evan ZhuZhu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander WeisWeis – Timo StodderStodder (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Edoardo LavagnoLavagno – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey ChepelevChepelev – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jurgen BriandBriand – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – Tomas FarjatFarjat (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
