Stuart Parker and Jason Jung will square off in the qualifications of the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT B. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.83
Stuart Parker -> 1.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Stuart Parker vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Stuart Parker and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Stuart Parker
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-15 | 26-11 | 0-2 | 4-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-21 | 18-12 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-26 | 23-12 | 0-0 | 10-8 | 7-5 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 44-16 | 40-12 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 24-10 | 18-8 | 0-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
Ranked no. 375, Parker reached the qualifications after defeating Federico Gaio 4-6 6-2 7-61.
In the qualifications against Gaio, Parker recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 7-61). During the match, Parker scored 95 points vs Gaio’s 83. The Brit was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Parker scored 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Stuart Parker was very efficient on serve to win 84% (42/50) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brit broke Gaio 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Parker has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (138-72). 2-1 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Parker has a composed93-39 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Parker has a compiled 2-1 win-loss record in 2023, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 382, the Chinese reached the qualifications after beating Dominik Palan 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Palan (6-4 6-1). During the match Jung scored 58 points vs Palan’s 35. Jung was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Jung bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jason Jung was extremely efficient on serve to win 89% (25/28) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Chinese broke Palan 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Jung has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Parker | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 17 |
| Pts | 95-83 | 58-35 |
| Total Points | 178 | 93 |
| Winners | 42 | 25 |
| %Winners | 44% | 43% |
Both Parker and Jung played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Stuart Parker lost 1 set while Jason Jung hasn’t dropped a set so far. Parker has played 1 set more than Jung (3 vs 2). Therefore, Parker played 14 games more than Jung. Parker scored 42 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, The Chinese recorded 25 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Parker | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
| 1st in | 50/84 | 28/39 |
| %1st in | 60% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 42/50 | 25/28 |
| %1st pts | 84% | 89% |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 64% |
Parker struck 6 aces . Jung scored 3 aces . Parker won 84% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 89% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Parker | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 33% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Stuart broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Parker lost his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Jason broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Chinese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Parker | |||
| Q1 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 7-61 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 95-83 | 95-83 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/84 | 50/84 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 42/50 | 42/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/34 | 19/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Palan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 58-35 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 25/28 | 25/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLWL
LWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Kacper ZukZuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Lucas PouillePouille (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Giovanni FonioFonio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kasidit SamrejSamrej – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Wishaya TrongcharoenchaikulTrongcharoenchaikul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Palaphoom KovapituktedKovapitukted – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
