Botic Van De Zandschulp and Maximilian Marterer will play each other in the quarter of the Tata Open Maharashtra for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 6:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.4
Maximilian Marterer -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Maximilian Marterer
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Maximilian Marterer square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they played, Van De Zandschulp won 6-4 6-2 in the 3rd round in the Koblenz Challenger back in 2020.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-32 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 35, the Dutch got to the quarter after defeating Flavio Cobolli 7-5 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Cobolli (7-5 6-4). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 69 points vs Cobolli’s 54. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Botic Van De Zandschulp was pretty effective on serve to win 73% (30/41) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Botic was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Cobolli 4 times.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 66% of his matches (287-149). 1-0 on hard in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a composed43-23 match record in the last 9 years on hard.
Botic has a compiled 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Pune
Botic has never competed in this tournament before.
Maximilian Marterer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-32 | 5-10 | 11-11 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-27 | 12-10 | 13-10 | 12-4 | 5-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-28 | 4-2 | 15-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 3-2 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 0-2 | 9-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 159, Maximilian got to the quarter after defeating Prajnesh Gunneswaran 7-66 3-6 7-5, Nikola Milojevic 6-2 6-3, Elias Ymer 6-2 3-6 6-3 and Laslo Djere 7-65 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Marterer had a good straight sets win against Djere (7-65 6-2). During the match Marterer scored 71 points vs Djere’s 58. The German was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Marterer struck 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Maximilian Marterer was very effective on serve to win 76% (34/45) of his 1st serve and 78% (14/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maximilian broke Djere twice after converting 22% of his break points (2/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Marterer started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
The German has a composed 4-0 win-loss record in 2023, 4-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 98 |
| Pts | 69-54 | 311-263 |
| Total Points | 123 | 574 |
| Winners | 30 | 137 |
| %Winners | 43% | 44% |
Van De Zandschulp played 1 match while Marterer competed in 4 matches. Marterer started his run from the qualifications while Van De Zandschulp had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Maximilian Marterer dropped 2 sets while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 8 set(s) less than Marterer (2 vs 10). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 76 games less than Marterer. Botic scored 30 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The German managed to score 137 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 39 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 9.8 |
| 1st in | 41/64 | 168/265 |
| %1st in | 64% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 137/168 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 60/97 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 62% |
Van De Zandschulp blasted 2 aces . Marterer bagged 39 aces (9.8 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Marterer won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 11/28 |
| % Converted | 100% | 39% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp dropped his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Marterer broke his opponents 11 times with a 39% conversion rate. Marterer conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R2 Cobolli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/64 | 41/64 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 30/41 | 30/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Marterer | ||||||
| Q1 Gunneswaran |
Q3 Milojevic |
R1 Ymer |
R2 Djere |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 3-6 7-5 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 17 | 26 | 21 | 98 | |
| pts | 100-102 | 59-35 | 81-68 | 71-58 | 311-263 | |
| Total points | 202 | 94 | 149 | 129 | 574 | |
| Winners | 43 | 27 | 33 | 34 | 137 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% | 41% | 48% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 5 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 39 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 52/93 | 30/44 | 41/65 | 45/63 | 168/265 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 68% | 63% | 71% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 43/52 | 27/30 | 33/41 | 34/45 | 137/168 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 90% | 80% | 76% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/41 | 9/14 | 13/24 | 14/18 | 60/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 64% | 54% | 78% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 3/7 | 4/6 | 2/9 | 11/28 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 43% | 67% | 22% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0/2 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWWWLLW
LWLLLWLLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marin CilicCilic – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
