Ricardas Berankis and Cem Ilkel will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Oeiras 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ricardas Berankis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ricardas Berankis is the pick to win this match.
Ricardas Berankis -> 1.84
Cem Ilkel -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ricardas Berankis vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 2nd time that Ricardas Berankis and Cem Ilkel clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ilkel (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Ilkel won 6-2 4-6 6-2 in the 1st round in Doha back in 2020.
Ricardas Berankis
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-15 | 12-8 | 5-1 | 10-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-22 | 7-9 | 2-3 | 16-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 12-9 | 1-4 | 7-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-23 | 9-8 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-8 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 168, Richard reached the 2nd round after defeating Gian Marco Moroni 2-6 6-1 7-5.
In the 1st round against Marco Moroni, Berankis recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 7-5). During the match, Berankis scored 97 points vs Marco Moroni’s 86. The Lithuanian was quite aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Regarding the service games, Berankis scored just 1 ace and he committed only 8 double faults. Ricardas Berankis lost the serve 5 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Berankis put 55% of his first serves in, winning 60% (31/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (22/42) on the 2nd serve. Richard broke Marco Moroni 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
Berankis has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (281-197). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Berankis has an aggregate 119-54 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Richard has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Oeiras 1 Challenger
Richard has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-16 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 378, Ilkel reached the 2nd round after beating Pedro Araujo 6-2 6-2, Rudolf Molleker 6-4 6-74 7-5 and Kenny de Schepper 4-6 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round against de Schepper, Ilkel recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-4). During the match Ilkel scored 85 points vs de Schepper’s 77. The Turk was quite aggressive to blast 36 winners.
About the serving games, Ilkel managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Cem Ilkel was quite effective on serve to win 71% (36/51) of his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cem broke de Schepper 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Turk has an aggregate 3-0 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Berankis | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 79 |
| Pts | 97-86 | 267-216 |
| Total Points | 183 | 483 |
| Winners | 31 | 109 |
| %Winners | 32% | 41% |
Berankis played 1 match while Ilkel competed in 3 matches. Ilkel started his run from the qualifications while Berankis had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Ricardas Berankis dropped 1 set, while Cem Ilkel lost 2 sets. Berankis has played 5 set(s) less than Ilkel (3 vs 8). Therefore, Berankis played 52 games less than Ilkel. The Lithuanian scored 31 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Ilkel scored 109 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Berankis | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 6 |
| 1st in | 52/94 | 138/230 |
| %1st in | 55% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 31/52 | 109/138 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 22/42 | 56/92 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 61% |
Berankis fired 1 ace . Ilkel also fired 18 aces (6 per match). Berankis won 60% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Berankis | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 12 |
| Converted | 6/13 | 12/22 |
| % Converted | 46% | 55% |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 38% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The Lithuanian broke his opponent 6 times with a 46% conversion rate. The Lithuanian surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponents 12 times with a 55% conversion rate. Ilkel conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Berankis | |||
| R1 Marco Moroni |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 97-86 | 97-86 | |
| Total points | 183 | 183 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 52/94 | 52/94 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 31/52 | 31/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/42 | 22/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 6/13 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Ilkel | |||||
| Q1 Araujo |
Q3 Molleker |
R1 de Schepper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-74 7-5 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 35 | 28 | 79 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 121-100 | 85-77 | 267-216 | |
| Total points | 100 | 221 | 162 | 483 | |
| Winners | 25 | 48 | 36 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 40% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 12 | 3 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 30/52 | 57/93 | 51/85 | 138/230 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 61% | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 25/30 | 48/57 | 36/51 | 109/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 84% | 71% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 23/36 | 21/34 | 56/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 64% | 62% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/11 | 4/6 | 12/22 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 36% | 67% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1/3 | 2/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | 50% | 183% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLLWW
LLLLLWLLLW Tennis Scores in Oeiras 1 Challenger
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – Mark LajalLajal (3-6 6-3 7-65) – See score progression
- Dino PrizmicPrizmic – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Louis WesselsWessels (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Pedro SousaSousa (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Aziz DougazDougaz (6-2 7-68) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (4-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Alibek KachmazovKachmazov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Valentin VacherotVacherot (1-6 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Mate ValkuszValkusz (2-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (2-6 6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Jaime FariaFaria (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Lucas GerchGerch (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Joao DominguesDomingues (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
