Marek Gengel and Henri Squire will square off in the 2nd round of the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT B. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marek Gengel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marek Gengel is the pick to win this match.
Marek Gengel -> 1.51
Henri Squire -> 2.43
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marek Gengel vs. Henri Squire
There is no head to head record between Marek Gengel and Henri Squire since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marek Gengel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-14 | 33-13 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-27 | 14-15 | 0-7 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 42-29 | 28-16 | 4-8 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 52-28 | 47-14 | 3-8 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-17 | 16-12 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 282 (career-high), Gengel reached the 2nd round after defeating Tennys Sandgren 6-4 6-74 6-1.
In the 1st round, Gengel defeated Sandgren (6-4 6-74 6-1). During the match, Gengel scored 107 points vs Sandgren’s 96. The Czech was very aggressive to blast 55 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gengel struck 14 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Marek Gengel lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Gengel put 70% of his first serves in, winning 71% (55/78) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Sandgren 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Gengel has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (220-169). 1-0 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gengel has a compiled158-81 record in the last 8 years on hard.
The Czech has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 1 Challenger
Gengel has never competed in this tournament before.
Henri Squire
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-21 | 1-2 | 14-8 | 16-8 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 357, Henri reached the 2nd round after beating Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul 6-4 6-3, Akira Santillan 6-4 6-4 and Gianluca Mager 6-3 6-76 6-3.
In the 1st round, Henri defeated Mager (6-3 6-76 6-3). During the match Squire scored 102 points vs Mager’s 81. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Squire overwhelmed his opponent with 21 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 65% of his first serves in, winning 84% (53/63) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (16/34) on the 2nd serve. Henri broke Mager 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Squire has a composed 3-0 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gengel | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 70 |
| Pts | 107-96 | 235-189 |
| Total Points | 203 | 424 |
| Winners | 55 | 115 |
| %Winners | 51% | 49% |
Gengel played 1 match while Squire competed in 3 matches. Squire started his run from the qualifications while Gengel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Marek Gengel conceded 1 set, while Henri Squire surrendered 1 set. Gengel has played 4 set(s) less than Squire (3 vs 7). Therefore, Gengel played 40 games less than Squire. Gengel scored 55 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Henri made 115 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gengel | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 14 | 42 |
| Avg per match | 14 | 14 |
| 1st in | 78/111 | 134/213 |
| %1st in | 70% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 55/78 | 115/134 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 41/79 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 52% |
Gengel recorded 14 aces . Squire managed to score 42 aces (14 per match). Gengel won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gengel | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/14 | 8/25 |
| % Converted | 36% | 32% |
| Conceded | 10 | 8 |
| Saved | 8 | 6 |
| % Saved | 80% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Gengel broke his opponent 5 times with a 36% conversion rate. The Czech conceded his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Squire broke his opponents 8 times with a 32% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gengel | |||
| R1 Sandgren |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-74 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 107-96 | 107-96 | |
| Total points | 203 | 203 | |
| Winners | 55 | 55 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 14 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 78/111 | 78/111 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 55/78 | 55/78 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 5/14 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Squire | |||||
| Q1 Trongcharoenchaikul |
Q3 Santillan |
R1 Mager |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-4 6-4 | 6-3 6-76 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 | 31 | 70 | |
| pts | 61-48 | 72-60 | 102-81 | 235-189 | |
| Total points | 109 | 132 | 183 | 424 | |
| Winners | 30 | 32 | 53 | 115 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 44% | 52% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 12 | 9 | 21 | 42 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 3 | 7 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 35/56 | 36/60 | 63/97 | 134/213 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 60% | 65% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 32/36 | 53/63 | 115/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 89% | 84% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/21 | 13/24 | 16/34 | 41/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 54% | 47% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/10 | 4/9 | 8/25 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 4/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 67% | 167% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWLWL
LLLLWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 1 Challenger
- Dayne KellyKelly – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Lucas PouillePouille (7-5 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (5-7 7-63 7-67) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Paul JubbJubb (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Thantub SuksumrarnSuksumrarn (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Gianluca MagerMager (6-3 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Dennis NovakNovak – Dan AddedAdded (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Maximus JonesJones (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Benjamin HassanHassan (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-4 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Marek GengelGengel – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (6-4 6-74 6-1) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Palaphoom KovapituktedKovapitukted (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Dayne KellyKelly – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Thantub SuksumrarnSuksumrarn (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Paul JubbJubb (6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Lucas PouillePouille (7-5 6-7(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-4 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Gianluca MagerMager (6-3 6-7(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dayne KellyKelly – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Mats MoraingMoraing (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Dennis NovakNovak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction
