![Prediction And Head To Head Kenny De Schepper Vs. Cem Ilkel U1oef5e4v4 Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Cem Ilkel](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Kenny-de-Schepper-vs.-Cem-Ilkel-U1oEf5e4V4.jpg)
Kenny de Schepper and Cem Ilkel will play each other in the 1st round of the Oeiras 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.45
Kenny de Schepper -> 2.61
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Cem Ilkel
There is no head to head record between Kenny de Schepper and Cem Ilkel since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Kenny de Schepper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-16 | 1-0 | 3-6 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 350, De Schepper got to the 1st round after beating Karl Friberg 6-3 6-3 and Jules Marie 4-6 7-62 6-4.
In the qualifications against Marie, Kenny recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-62 6-4). During the match, de Schepper scored 112 points vs Marie’s 111. Kenny was extremely aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Regarding the service games, de Schepper recorded 19 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Kenny de Schepper lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, de Schepper put 62% of his first serves in, winning 71% (47/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (17/41) on the 2nd serve. Kenny broke Marie 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
De Schepper started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 1 set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
de Schepper has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (277-249). 2-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, de Schepper has an aggregate 115-85 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kenny has an aggregate 2-0 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Oeiras 1 Challenger
Kenny has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 9-16 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 378, Cem got to the 1st round after defeating Pedro Araujo 6-2 6-2 and Rudolf Molleker 6-4 6-74 7-5.
In the qualifications, Cem defeated Molleker (6-4 6-74 7-5). During the match Ilkel scored 121 points vs Molleker’s 100. Cem was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Ilkel managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cem Ilkel was very efficient on serve to win 84% (48/57) of his 1st serve and 64% (23/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Turk broke Molleker 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cem started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
The Turk has a compiled 2-0 win-loss record in 2023, 2-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | de Schepper | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
Tot Games | 51 | 51 |
Pts | 168-151 | 182-139 |
Total Points | 319 | 321 |
Winners | 78 | 73 |
%Winners | 46% | 40% |
Both de Schepper and Ilkel played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Kenny de Schepper surrendered 1 set, while Cem Ilkel dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, de Schepper and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 5. They also played the same amount of games (51). The French player scored 78 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Ilkel recorded 73 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | de Schepper | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Aces | 31 | 15 |
Avg per match | 15.5 | 7.5 |
1st in | 104/155 | 87/145 |
%1st in | 67% | 60% |
1st pts | 78/104 | 73/87 |
%1st pts | 75% | 84% |
2nd pts | 24/51 | 35/58 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 60% |
de Schepper managed to score 31 aces (15.5 per match). Ilkel managed to score 15 aces (7.5 per match). de Schepper won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | de Schepper | Ilkel |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 8 |
Converted | 7/16 | 8/16 |
% Converted | 44% | 50% |
Conceded | 11 | 4 |
Saved | 7 | 2 |
% Saved | 64% | 50% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Kenny broke his opponents 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. De Schepper dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. The Turk broke his opponents 8 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
de Schepper | ||||
Q1 Friberg |
Q3 Marie |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | 4-6 7-62 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 33 | 51 | |
pts | 56-40 | 112-111 | 168-151 | |
Total points | 96 | 223 | 319 | |
Winners | 31 | 47 | 78 | |
%Winners | 55% | 42% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 12 | 19 | 31 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 38/48 | 66/107 | 104/155 | |
% 1st in | 79% | 62% | 67% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 47/66 | 78/104 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 71% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 17/41 | 24/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 41% | 47% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 4/13 | 7/16 | |
Converted % | 100% | 31% | 44% | |
Conceded | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 5/9 | 7 | |
Saved % | 100% | 56% | 78% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Ilkel | ||||
Q1 Araujo |
Q3 Molleker |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-74 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 35 | 51 | |
pts | 61-39 | 121-100 | 182-139 | |
Total points | 100 | 221 | 321 | |
Winners | 25 | 48 | 73 | |
%Winners | 41% | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 12 | 15 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
1st in | 30/52 | 57/93 | 87/145 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 61% | 60% | |
1st pts | 25/30 | 48/57 | 73/87 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 84% | 84% | |
2nd pts | 12/22 | 23/36 | 35/58 | |
% 2nd pts | 55% | 64% | 60% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
Converted | 4/5 | 4/11 | 8/16 | |
Converted % | 80% | 36% | 50% | |
Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 33% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Oeiras 1 Challenger
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Lucas GerchGerch (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Mate ValkuszValkusz (2-6 6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Raphael CollignonCollignon – Jaime FariaFaria (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Clement TaburTabur (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (2-6 6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Lukas NeumayerNeumayer (7-5 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Pedro SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Aziz DougazDougaz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction