![Prediction And Head To Head Kenny De Schepper Vs. Jules Marie 2vb6byx4an Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Jules Marie](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Kenny-de-Schepper-vs.-Jules-Marie-2Vb6ByX4aN.jpg)
Kenny de Schepper and Jules Marie will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Oeiras 1 Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jules Marie who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jules Marie is the pick to win this match.
Jules Marie -> 1.87
Kenny de Schepper -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Jules Marie
This will be the 3rd time that Kenny de Schepper and Jules Marie face off. The head to head is 2-0 for de Schepper (see full H2H stats), 2-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, de Schepper won 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 in the semifinal in Balma back in 2022.
Kenny de Schepper
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-16 | 1-0 | 3-6 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 350, the French player got to the qualifications after beating Karl Friberg 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Kenny had a good straight sets win against Friberg (6-3 6-3). During the match, de Schepper scored 56 points vs Friberg’s 40. De Schepper was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, de Schepper bagged 12 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults. Kenny de Schepper was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 82% (31/38) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Kenny was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Friberg 3 times.
de Schepper has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (276-249). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, de Schepper has a composed 114-85 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Kenny has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Oeiras 1 Challenger
De Schepper has never competed in this tournament before.
Jules Marie
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 20-19 | 13-11 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 66-27 | 42-13 | 6-5 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-23 | 10-7 | 12-8 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-1 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 487, the French player got to the qualifications after defeating Samuel Vincent Ruggeri 4-6 7-66 6-2.
In the qualifications against Vincent Ruggeri, Jules recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-66 6-2). During the match Marie scored 98 points vs Vincent Ruggeri’s 93. Marie was very aggressive to blast 53 winners.
About the serving games, Marie blasted 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jules Marie was very efficient on serve to win 72% (53/74) of his 1st serve and 52% (16/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The French player broke Vincent Ruggeri 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Jules has a composed 1-0 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | de Schepper | Marie |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 18 | 31 |
Pts | 56-40 | 98-93 |
Total Points | 96 | 191 |
Winners | 31 | 53 |
%Winners | 55% | 54% |
Both de Schepper and Marie played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jules Marie lost 1 set while Kenny de Schepper hasn’t conceded a set so far. de Schepper has played 1 set(s) less than Marie (2 vs 3). Therefore, de Schepper played 13 games less than Marie. De Schepper scored 31 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, The French player recorded 53 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | de Schepper | Marie |
---|---|---|
Aces | 12 | 7 |
Avg per match | 12 | 7 |
1st in | 38/48 | 74/105 |
%1st in | 79% | 70% |
1st pts | 31/38 | 53/74 |
%1st pts | 82% | 72% |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 16/31 |
%2nd pts | 70% | 52% |
de Schepper struck 12 aces . Marie bagged 7 aces . de Schepper won 82% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Marie won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | de Schepper | Marie |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 3 |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/4 |
% Converted | 100% | 75% |
Conceded | 2 | 7 |
Saved | 2 | 5 |
% Saved | 100% | 71% |
Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
De Schepper broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. De Schepper very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Jules broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
de Schepper | |||
Q1 Friberg |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 56-40 | 56-40 | |
Total points | 96 | 96 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 55% | 55% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 12 | 12 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 38/48 | 38/48 | |
% 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Marie | |||
Q1 Vincent |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-66 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 98-93 | 98-93 | |
Total points | 191 | 191 | |
Winners | 53 | 53 | |
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 7 | 7 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 74/105 | 74/105 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
1st pts | 53/74 | 53/74 | |
% 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 16/31 | 16/31 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Jules MarieMarie (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Richard BerankisBerankis – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino – Pol Martin TiffonMartin Tiffon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Pedro SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Edan LeshemLeshem (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DecampsDecamps – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-1) – H2H and prediction