Raphael Collignon and Maik Steiner will face off in the qualifications of the Maia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Raphael Collignon who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Raphael Collignon is the pick to win this match.
Raphael Collignon -> 1.113
Maik Steiner -> 5.65
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Raphael Collignon vs. Maik Steiner
There is no head to head record between Raphael Collignon and Maik Steiner since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Raphael Collignon
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67-22 | 5-3 | 46-8 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-16 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 8-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 61-22 | 14-4 | 38-12 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 20-20 | 11-11 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-6 | 6-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 297, Collignon reached the qualifications after defeating Goncalo Falcao 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Raphael had a good straight sets win against Falcao (6-2 6-2). During the match, Collignon scored 57 points vs Falcao’s 30. The Belgian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Collignon was unable to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Raphael Collignon was very effective on serve to win 93% (26/28) of his 1st serve and 60% (6/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Raphael broke Falcao 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Collignon has a solid match record in the last 3 years having won 65% of his matches (87-47). 36-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Collignon has an aggregate47-21 record in the last 3 years on clay.
Raphael’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir,M15 Brcko,M25 Arlon,M25 Marburg,M25 Koksijde and M25 Nevers.
The Belgian has a compiled 59-21 win-loss record in 2022, 36-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maia Challenger
Raphael has never competed in this tournament before.
Maik Steiner
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-19 | 17-7 | 21-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 27-28 | 1-6 | 24-19 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-27 | 38-19 | 11-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 47-28 | 12-10 | 35-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-8 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 900 (career-high), Maik reached the qualifications after defeating Duarte Vale 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, Steiner had a good straight sets win against Vale (6-3 6-0). During the match Steiner scored 60 points vs Vale’s 38. Maik was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Steiner bagged 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Maik Steiner was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Steiner broke Vale 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The German has an aggregate 49-26 win-loss record in 2022, 11-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Collignon | Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
| Pts | 57-30 | 60-38 |
| Total Points | 87 | 98 |
| Winners | 26 | 21 |
| %Winners | 46% | 35% |
Both Collignon and Steiner played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Collignon and Steiner have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Collignon played 1 game more than Steiner. The Belgian scored 26 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The German fired 21 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Collignon | Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 4 |
| 1st in | 28/38 | 28/49 |
| %1st in | 74% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 21/28 |
| %1st pts | 93% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 13/21 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 62% |
Collignon didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Steiner managed to score 4 aces . Collignon won 93% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Steiner won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Collignon | Steiner |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 57% | 44% |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Collignon broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Raphael quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Steiner broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Steiner was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Collignon | |||
| Q1 Falcao |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 57-30 | 57-30 | |
| Total points | 87 | 87 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 28/38 | 28/38 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 26/28 | 26/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 93% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Steiner | |||
| Q1 Vale |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 60-38 | |
| Total points | 98 | 98 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/49 | 28/49 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/21 | 13/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWLLL
LWWWWLWWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Alexey VatutinVatutin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – Andrea PicchionePicchione (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Denis IstominIstomin (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Kenny de Schepperde Schepper (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Louis WesselsWessels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandar LazarovLazarov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Pedro SousaSousa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gauthier OnclinOnclin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
