Emilio Gomez and Tomas Farjat will play each other in the 2nd round of the Temuco Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emilio Gomez who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emilio Gomez is the pick to win this match.
Emilio Gomez -> 1.089
Tomas Farjat -> 6.85
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emilio Gomez vs. Tomas Farjat
There is no head to head record between Emilio Gomez and Tomas Farjat since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emilio Gomez
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 16-28 | 8-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 47-26 | 38-15 | 1-3 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 37-33 | 25-15 | 9-11 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 2-5 | 4-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 114, the Ecuadorian got to the 2nd round after defeating Juan Pablo Paz 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Ecuadorian had a good straight sets win against Pablo Paz (6-4 6-3). During the match, Gomez scored 64 points vs Pablo Paz’s 53. Gomez was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gomez bagged 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Emilio Gomez lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Gomez put 47% of his first serves in, winning 72% (23/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (18/36) on the 2nd serve. Emilio broke Pablo Paz 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Gomez has winning record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (352-248). 36-14 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gomez has a compiled 178-101 record in the last years on hard.
The Ecuadorian’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Salinas Challenger,the Malaga Challenger,the Winnipeg Challenger,the Lexington Challenger,the Columbus 2 Challenger and the Gwangju Challenger.
Gomez has a compiled 45-25 win-loss record in 2022, 36-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Temuco Challenger
Emilio has never competed in this tournament before.
Tomas Farjat
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-15 | 0-0 | 14-14 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-29 | 0-0 | 31-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-20 | 5-3 | 21-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 39-16 | 22-11 | 17-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 601, the Argentine got to the 2nd round after defeating Thomas Menzel 6-1 6-4, Blaise Bicknell 4-6 6-1 7-66 and Gonzalo Villanueva 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Farjat had a good straight sets win against Villanueva (6-3 6-4). During the match Farjat scored 77 points vs Villanueva’s 63. Farjat was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Farjat scored 8 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Tomas Farjat lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Farjat put 63% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Villanueva 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
The Argentine’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Santa Cruz.
Farjat has a composed 26-19 win-loss record in 2022, 5-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gomez | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 66 |
| Pts | 64-53 | 233-186 |
| Total Points | 117 | 419 |
| Winners | 23 | 95 |
| %Winners | 36% | 41% |
Gomez played 1 match while Farjat competed in 3 matches. Farjat started his run from the qualifications while Gomez had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tomas Farjat lost 1 set while Emilio Gomez hasn’t lost a set so far. Gomez has played 5 set(s) less than Farjat (2 vs 7). Therefore, Gomez played 47 games less than Farjat. The Ecuadorian scored 23 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Argentine made 95 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gomez | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 15 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 32/68 | 135/214 |
| %1st in | 47% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 95/135 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 46/79 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Gomez struck 2 aces . Farjat recorded 15 aces (5 per match). Gomez won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Farjat won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gomez | Farjat |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 12 |
| Converted | 4/5 | 12/28 |
| % Converted | 80% | 43% |
| Conceded | 5 | 17 |
| Saved | 3 | 11 |
| % Saved | 60% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
The Ecuadorian broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. The Ecuadorian dropped his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Farjat broke his opponents 12 times with a 43% conversion rate. Tomas conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gomez | |||
| R1 Pablo Paz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 64-53 | 64-53 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 32/68 | 32/68 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/36 | 18/36 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Farjat | |||||
| Q1 Menzel |
Q3 Bicknell |
R1 Villanueva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | 4-6 6-1 7-66 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 | 19 | 66 | |
| pts | 53-32 | 103-91 | 77-63 | 233-186 | |
| Total points | 85 | 194 | 140 | 419 | |
| Winners | 19 | 47 | 29 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 46% | 38% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 8 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 21/43 | 69/99 | 45/72 | 135/214 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 70% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | 47/69 | 29/45 | 95/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 68% | 64% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/22 | 19/30 | 13/27 | 46/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 63% | 48% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/7 | 5/14 | 12/28 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 43% | 36% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 9 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 5/7 | 6/9 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 71% | 67% | 138% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLLW
LWWLLLWWWW Tennis Scores in Temuco Challenger
- Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (7-67 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nick HardtHardt – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-3 3-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Benjamin LockLock (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante (7-64 6-77 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas FarjatFarjat – Emilio GomezGomez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
