Makoto Ochi and James Kent Trotter will face off in the qualifications of the Yokkaichi Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on SUB CENTER. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Kent Trotter who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Kent Trotter is the pick to win this match.
James Kent Trotter -> 1.37
Makoto Ochi -> 2.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Makoto Ochi vs. James Kent Trotter
There is no head to head record between Makoto Ochi and James Kent Trotter since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Makoto Ochi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-11 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-27 | 26-25 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-24 | 33-21 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-17 | 17-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 524, Ochi reached the qualifications after defeating Asahi Yamanaka 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, Ochi had a good straight sets win against Yamanaka (6-0 6-1). During the match, Ochi scored 57 points vs Yamanaka’s 25. Ochi was very aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ochi recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Makoto Ochi was quite effective on serve to win 89% (17/19) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Makoto broke Yamanaka 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Ochi has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 56% of his matches (174-136). 32-20 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Ochi has a composed133-98 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Ochi’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Chiang Rai.
The Japanese has a compiled 32-23 win-loss record in 2022, 32-20 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
James Kent Trotter
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-13 | 11-7 | 1-3 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 596, James reached the qualifications after defeating Toshihide Matsui 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Kent had a good straight sets win against Matsui (6-4 6-4). During the match Kent scored 71 points vs Matsui’s 58. James was quite aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Kent struck 13 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. James Kent Trotter was very effective on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 71% (10/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Japanese broke Matsui twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
The Japanese’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Edwardsville.
Kent has a composed 21-9 win-loss record in 2022, 15-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ochi | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 13 | 20 |
| Pts | 57-25 | 71-58 |
| Total Points | 82 | 129 |
| Winners | 17 | 30 |
| %Winners | 30% | 42% |
Both Ochi and Kent played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ochi and Kent have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Ochi played 7 games less than Kent. Ochi scored 17 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, James scored 30 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ochi | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 13 |
| 1st in | 19/30 | 35/49 |
| %1st in | 63% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 17/19 | 30/35 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 10/14 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 71% |
Ochi scored 3 aces . Kent made 13 aces . Ochi won 89% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Kent won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ochi | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 2 |
| Converted | 6/12 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 50% | 29% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Ochi extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. James was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Ochi | |||
| Q1 Yamanaka |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 57-25 | 57-25 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 17/19 | 17/19 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kent | |||
| Q1 Matsui |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-58 | 71-58 | |
| Total points | 129 | 129 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/49 | 35/49 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 10/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLLLWWLL
LWWWWWLWWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yuichi SugitaSugita (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rimpei KawakamiKawakami – Duckhee LeeLee (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yunseong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shinji HazawaHazawa – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
