Jason Jung and Shuichi Sekiguchi will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Yokkaichi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.363
Shuichi Sekiguchi -> 2.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Shuichi Sekiguchi
This will be the 2nd time that Jason Jung and Shuichi Sekiguchi square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Jung (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Jung won 7-6(6) 6-1 in the qualifications in the Bangkok Challenger back in 2016.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 399, Jung reached the qualifications after defeating Masamichi Imamura 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, Jung had a good straight sets win against Imamura (6-4 6-3). During the match, Jung scored 81 points vs Imamura’s 66. Jung was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jung scored 2 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 71% of his first serves in, winning 72% (33/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (7/19) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Imamura 5 times after converting 26% of his break points (5/19).
Jung has positive record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (329-263). 13-12 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has an aggregate 230-161 record in the last years on hard.
Jason has a compiled 25-26 win-loss record in 2022, 13-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Yokkaichi Challenger
Jung has never competed in this tournament before.
Shuichi Sekiguchi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 23-14 | 22-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-14 | 28-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 5-4 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 54-22 | 47-18 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 6-2 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 565, Shuichi got to the qualifications after beating Chak Lam Coleman Wong 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Lam Coleman Wong (6-2 6-1). During the match Sekiguchi scored 56 points vs Lam Coleman Wong’s 34. Sekiguchi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Sekiguchi bagged 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Shuichi Sekiguchi lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Sekiguchi put 67% of his first serves in, winning 69% (22/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Lam Coleman Wong 6 times after converting 50% of his break points (6/12).
Sekiguchi’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion and M25 Sapporo.
The Japanese has a compiled 27-13 win-loss record in 2022, 27-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Sekiguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 15 |
| Pts | 81-66 | 56-34 |
| Total Points | 147 | 90 |
| Winners | 33 | 22 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Both Jung and Sekiguchi played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jung and Sekiguchi have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jung played 4 games more than Sekiguchi. The Chinese scored 33 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Sekiguchi fired 22 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Sekiguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2 |
| 1st in | 46/65 | 32/48 |
| %1st in | 71% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 22/32 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 7/19 | 9/16 |
| %2nd pts | 37% | 56% |
Jung scored 2 aces . Sekiguchi recorded 2 aces . Jung won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 37% of the points. On the other side, Sekiguchi won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Sekiguchi |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/19 | 6/12 |
| % Converted | 26% | 50% |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 89% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 5 times with a 26% conversion rate. The Chinese surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent 6 times with a 50% conversion rate. Sekiguchi conceded his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Imamura |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 81-66 | 81-66 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 46/65 | 46/65 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 33/46 | 33/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/19 | 7/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 37% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/19 | 5/19 | |
| Converted % | 26% | 26% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Sekiguchi | |||
| Q1 Lam Coleman Wong |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 56-34 | 56-34 | |
| Total points | 90 | 90 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 22/32 | 22/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 6/12 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Naoki NakagawaNakagawa – Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Makoto OchiOchi – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Yuichi SugitaSugita (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rimpei KawakamiKawakami – Duckhee LeeLee (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Yunseong ChungChung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shinji HazawaHazawa – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
