![Prediction And Head To Head Michael Mmoh Vs. Charles Broom Deukgkcrsf Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Charles Broom](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Michael-Mmoh-vs.-Charles-Broom-DeUkGkcrsf.jpg)
Michael Mmoh and Charles Broom will clash against each other in the quarter of the Drummondville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:30 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Mmoh who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Mmoh is the pick to win this match.
Michael Mmoh -> 1.22
Charles Broom -> 4.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Mmoh vs. Charles Broom
There is no head to head record between Michael Mmoh and Charles Broom since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Michael Mmoh
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 8-12 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 31-21 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 44-29 | 18-12 | 8-7 | 17-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-18 | 14-11 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 13-9 | 6-5 | 3-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118, Michael got to the quarter after defeating Valentin Vacherot 7-5 6-2 and Maks Kasnikowski 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Mmoh had a good straight sets win against Kasnikowski (6-3 7-5). During the match, Mmoh scored 72 points vs Kasnikowski’s 50. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mmoh managed to score 12 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Michael Mmoh was quite efficient on serve to win 94% (30/32) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Kasnikowski 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Michael hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to win 58% of the points he played.
Mmoh has good match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (250-176). 15-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Mmoh has a composed 59-31 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Michael’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Tallahassee Challenger,the Cary Challenger and the Fairfield Challenger.
Mmoh has a compiled 42-28 win-loss record in 2022, 15-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Drummondville Challenger
Charles Broom
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 30-19 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-34 | 8-7 | 0-4 | 20-15 | 11-6 | 2-2 |
2022 | 44-30 | 28-17 | 0-0 | 10-7 | 6-6 | 0-0 |
2021 | 35-10 | 20-6 | 8-3 | 7-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 7-3 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 383, Charles reached the quarter after beating Max Hans Rehberg 6-4 1-0 ret. and Gabriel Diallo 6-4 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Broom had a good straight sets win against Diallo (6-4 6-2). During the match Broom scored 64 points vs Diallo’s 49. Charles was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Broom managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Charles Broom was quite efficient on serve to win 76% (28/37) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Broom broke Diallo 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Charles’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Bath,M25 Calabasas,M15 Heraklion and M15 Helsinki.
Charles has an overall 44-29 win-loss record in 2022, 10-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Mmoh | Broom |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
Tot Games | 41 | 29 |
Pts | 143-103 | 99-79 |
Total Points | 246 | 178 |
Winners | 56 | 36 |
%Winners | 39% | 36% |
Both Mmoh and Broom played 2 matches. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Mmoh has played 1 set(s) less than Broom (4 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Mmoh played 12 games more than Broom. Michael scored 56 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Charles fired 36 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Mmoh | Broom |
---|---|---|
Aces | 16 | 4 |
Avg per match | 8 | 2 |
1st in | 66/117 | 54/87 |
%1st in | 56% | 62% |
1st pts | 56/66 | 36/54 |
%1st pts | 85% | 67% |
2nd pts | 28/51 | 17/33 |
%2nd pts | 55% | 52% |
Mmoh scored 16 aces (8 per match). Broom fired 4 aces (2 per match). Mmoh won 85% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Broom won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Mmoh | Broom |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 8 |
Converted | 7/8 | 8/12 |
% Converted | 88% | 67% |
Conceded | 4 | 10 |
Saved | 2 | 7 |
% Saved | 50% | 70% |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke his opponents 7 times with a 88% conversion rate. Michael surrendered his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded.
Mmoh | ||||
R1 Vacherot |
R2 Kasnikowski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-2 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 21 | 41 | |
pts | 71-53 | 72-50 | 143-103 | |
Total points | 124 | 122 | 246 | |
Winners | 26 | 30 | 56 | |
%Winners | 37% | 42% | 39% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 4 | 12 | 16 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
1st in | 34/62 | 32/55 | 66/117 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 58% | 56% | |
1st pts | 26/34 | 30/32 | 56/66 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 94% | 85% | |
2nd pts | 15/28 | 13/23 | 28/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 57% | 55% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 3/4 | 7/8 | |
Converted % | 100% | 75% | 88% | |
Conceded | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 0% | 67% | 34% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Broom | ||||
R1 Hans |
R2 Diallo |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 1-0 ret. | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 11 | 18 | 29 | |
pts | 35-30 | 64-49 | 99-79 | |
Total points | 65 | 113 | 178 | |
Winners | 8 | 28 | 36 | |
%Winners | 23% | 44% | 36% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 17/34 | 37/53 | 54/87 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 70% | 62% | |
1st pts | 8/17 | 28/37 | 36/54 | |
% 1st pts | 47% | 76% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 7/17 | 10/16 | 17/33 | |
% 2nd pts | 41% | 63% | 52% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 3/6 | 8/12 | |
Converted % | 83% | 50% | 67% | |
Conceded | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
Saved | 5/8 | 2/2 | 7 | |
Saved % | 63% | 100% | 82% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Drummondville Challenger
- Charles Broom/Constantin FrantzenBroom/Constantin Frantzen – Zvonimir Babic/Kelsey StevensonBabic/Kelsey Stevenson (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aziz DougazDougaz – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Michael MmohMmoh (0-0) – H2H and prediction