Naoki Nakagawa and Shinji Hazawa will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Kobe Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Naoki Nakagawa who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Naoki Nakagawa is the pick to win this match.
Naoki Nakagawa -> 1.48
Shinji Hazawa -> 2.57
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Naoki Nakagawa vs. Shinji Hazawa
This will be the 2nd time that Naoki Nakagawa and Shinji Hazawa clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nakagawa (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Nakagawa won 6-4 6-4 in the qualifications in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger back in September 2022.
Naoki Nakagawa
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 25-16 | 13-12 | 1-1 | 11-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 43-23 | 42-19 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 31-27 | 16-16 | 10-9 | 5-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-15 | 32-13 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-4 | 14-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 448, Nakagawa got to the 2nd round after beating Asahi Harazaki 6-3 6-2, Mukund Sasikumar 6-3 7-65 and Shintaro Mochizuki 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (6-4 6-2). During the match, Nakagawa scored 64 points vs Mochizuki’s 52. Naoki was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nakagawa fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Naoki Nakagawa lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Nakagawa put 51% of his first serves in, winning 75% (21/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Mochizuki 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Nakagawa has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (256-165). 5-1 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nakagawa has a composed8-7 match record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Nakagawa has a composed 31-25 win-loss record in 2022, 5-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kobe Challenger
Shinji Hazawa
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 14-14 | 14-12 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 16-15 | 14-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 51-27 | 49-26 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 655, Shinji reached the 2nd round after beating James Duckworth 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Hazawa had a good straight sets win against Duckworth (6-4 6-4). During the match Hazawa scored 66 points vs Duckworth’s 56. Hazawa was quite aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, Hazawa recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Shinji Hazawa conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Hazawa put 73% of his first serves in, winning 81% (35/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (8/16) on the 2nd serve. Shinji broke Duckworth twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
The Japanese’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Seremban.
Hazawa has a composed 49-25 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nakagawa | Hazawa |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
Tot Games | 57 | 20 |
Pts | 214-168 | 66-56 |
Total Points | 382 | 122 |
Winners | 71 | 35 |
%Winners | 33% | 53% |
Nakagawa played 3 matches while Hazawa competed in 1 match. Nakagawa started his run from the qualifications while Hazawa had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Nakagawa has played 4 sets more than Hazawa (6 vs 2). Therefore, Nakagawa played 37 games more than Hazawa. Naoki scored 71 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Hazawa managed to score 35 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nakagawa | Hazawa |
---|---|---|
Aces | 14 | 3 |
Avg per match | 4.7 | 3 |
1st in | 91/174 | 43/59 |
%1st in | 52% | 73% |
1st pts | 71/91 | 35/43 |
%1st pts | 78% | 81% |
2nd pts | 44/83 | 8/16 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 50% |
Nakagawa fired 14 aces (4.7 per match). Hazawa managed to score 3 aces . Nakagawa won 78% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Hazawa won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nakagawa | Hazawa |
---|---|---|
Won | 13 | 2 |
Converted | 13/24 | 2/3 |
% Converted | 54% | 67% |
Conceded | 15 | 2 |
Saved | 10 | 2 |
% Saved | 67% | 100% |
Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Nakagawa broke his opponents 13 times with a 54% conversion rate. Naoki dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The Japanese broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Hazawa was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Nakagawa | |||||
Q1 Harazaki |
Q3 Kumar Mukund |
R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-3 7-65 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 22 | 18 | 57 | |
pts | 65-44 | 85-72 | 64-52 | 214-168 | |
Total points | 109 | 157 | 116 | 382 | |
Winners | 26 | 24 | 21 | 71 | |
%Winners | 40% | 28% | 33% | 33% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 4 | 7 | 3 | 14 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
1st in | 31/58 | 32/61 | 28/55 | 91/174 | |
% 1st in | 53% | 52% | 51% | 52% | |
1st pts | 26/31 | 24/32 | 21/28 | 71/91 | |
% 1st pts | 84% | 75% | 75% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 14/27 | 17/29 | 13/27 | 44/83 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | 59% | 48% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 4/8 | 5/10 | 13/24 | |
Converted % | 67% | 50% | 50% | 54% | |
Conceded | 3 | 5 | 7 | 15 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 3/5 | 5/7 | 10 | |
Saved % | 67% | 60% | 71% | 66% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Hazawa | |||||
R1 Duckworth |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |||
pts | 66-56 | 66-56 | |||
Total points | 122 | 122 | |||
Winners | 35 | 35 | |||
%Winners | 53% | 53% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |||
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
1st in | 43/59 | 43/59 | |||
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | |||
1st pts | 35/43 | 35/43 | |||
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |||
2nd pts | 8/16 | 8/16 | |||
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 2 | |||
Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |||
Converted % | 67% | 67% | |||
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |||
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |||
Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Kobe Challenger
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (4-6 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Rinky HijikataHijikata (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- John MillmanMillman – Shintaro ImaiImai (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Jason JungJung (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – John MillmanMillman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Shinji HazawaHazawa – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-1) – H2H and prediction