Mateus Alves and Orlando Luz will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Sao Leopoldo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on QUADRA 4. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Orlando Luz who should win in 3 sets.
Orlando Luz -> 1.7
Mateus Alves -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mateus Alves vs. Orlando Luz
There is no head to head record between Mateus Alves and Orlando Luz since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mateus Alves
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 28-28 | 1-4 | 27-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 46-31 | 3-5 | 43-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-28 | 4-7 | 26-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-15 | 5-1 | 17-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-33 | 21-20 | 11-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 460, Alves reached the qualifications after defeating Grigoriy Lomakin 6-75 7-64 7-65.
In the qualifications against Lomakin, Mateus recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-64 7-65). During the match, Alves scored 135 points vs Lomakin’s 126. The Brazilian was very aggressive to blast 61 winners.
Talking about the service games, Alves fired 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Mateus Alves lost the serve 4 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Alves put 65% of his first serves in, winning 72% (61/85) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. The Brazilian broke Lomakin 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Alves has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (129-88). 13-12 on clay in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Alves has a compiled51-50 record in the last 5 years on clay.
Alves’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Campos do Jordao.
Mateus has an overall 18-12 win-loss record in 2022, 13-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sao Leopoldo Challenger
Mateus has never competed in this tournament before.
Orlando Luz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 26-27 | 1-3 | 25-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-21 | 0-1 | 34-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-18 | 0-0 | 24-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 40-28 | 0-2 | 40-26 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 579, the Brazilian got to the qualifications after beating Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Luz had a good straight sets win against Ribeiro De Almeida (6-2 6-4). During the match Luz scored 67 points vs Ribeiro De Almeida’s 48. Orlando was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Luz wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Orlando Luz was pretty effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 71% (12/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Orlando broke Ribeiro De Almeida 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The Brazilian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Skopje and M15 Skopje.
Luz has an overall 20-15 win-loss record in 2022, 20-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Alves | Luz |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 18 |
| Pts | 135-126 | 67-48 |
| Total Points | 261 | 115 |
| Winners | 61 | 26 |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% |
Both Alves and Luz played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Mateus Alves dropped 1 set while Orlando Luz hasn’t dropped a set so far. Alves has played 1 set more than Luz (3 vs 2). Therefore, Alves played 21 games more than Luz. Alves scored 61 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Luz managed to score 26 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Alves | Luz |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 0 |
| 1st in | 85/130 | 34/51 |
| %1st in | 65% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 61/85 | 26/34 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 12/17 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 71% |
Alves bagged 3 aces . Luz didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Alves won 72% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Luz won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 71% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Alves | Luz |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 44% | 60% |
| Conceded | 13 | 5 |
| Saved | 9 | 5 |
| % Saved | 69% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 |
The Brazilian broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Alves lost his serve 4 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Luz broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Brazilian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Alves | |||
| Q1 Lomakin | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 39 | 39 | |
| pts | 135-126 | 135-126 | |
| Total points | 261 | 261 | |
| Winners | 61 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 85/130 | 85/130 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 61/85 | 61/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
| Saved | 9/13 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Luz | |||
| Q1 Ribeiro De Almeida | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 67-48 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/51 | 34/51 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/17 | 12/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Sao Leopoldo Challenger
- Damien WengerWenger – Nicolas ZanellatoZanellato (7-64 6-75 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Wilson LeiteLeite – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (6-3 3-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Max HoukesHoukes – Fermin TentiTenti (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Fernando YamacitaYamacita (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Gonzalo LamaLama (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Orlando LuzLuz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco ComesanaComesana – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Gastao EliasElias (0-0) – H2H and prediction