Kenta Miyoshi and Inaki Montes-De La Torre will play each other in the qualifications of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Inaki Montes-De La Torre who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Inaki Montes-De La Torre is the pick to win this match.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre -> 1.091
Kenta Miyoshi -> 6.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenta Miyoshi vs. Inaki Montes-De La Torre
There is no head to head record between Kenta Miyoshi and Inaki Montes-De La Torre since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kenta Miyoshi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-12 | 12-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-11 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Miyoshi got to the qualifications after beating Gage Brymer 3-6 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications against Brymer, Miyoshi recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-63). During the match, Miyoshi scored 108 points vs Brymer’s 105. The Japanese was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Miyoshi fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Kenta Miyoshi lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Miyoshi put 57% of his first serves in, winning 69% (41/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (22/45) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Brymer 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Miyoshi has a solid match record in the last 1 years having won 67% of his matches (4-2). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Miyoshi has an aggregate1-0 record in the last 1 years on indoor hard courts.
Kenta has a composed 4-2 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Kenta has never competed in this tournament before.
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-12 | 15-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-9 | 5-4 | 9-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 22-11 | 8-7 | 7-1 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-7 | 9-4 | 10-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 522, Inaki got to the qualifications after defeating Oliver Okonkwo 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Inaki had a good straight sets win against Okonkwo (6-1 6-3). During the match Montes-De La Torre scored 64 points vs Okonkwo’s 43. The Spaniard was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Montes-De La Torre scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Inaki Montes-De La Torre lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Montes-De La Torre put 73% of his first serves in, winning 69% (25/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the 2nd serve. Inaki broke Okonkwo 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Inaki’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Mungia.
Inaki has a composed 21-10 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Miyoshi | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 16 |
| Pts | 108-105 | 64-43 |
| Total Points | 213 | 107 |
| Winners | 41 | 25 |
| %Winners | 38% | 39% |
Both Miyoshi and Montes-De La Torre played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kenta Miyoshi lost 1 set while Inaki Montes-De La Torre hasn’t lost a set so far. Miyoshi has played 1 set more than Montes-De La Torre (3 vs 2). Therefore, Miyoshi played 16 games more than Montes-De La Torre. Miyoshi scored 41 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Montes-De La Torre bagged 25 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Miyoshi | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 1 |
| 1st in | 59/104 | 36/49 |
| %1st in | 57% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 41/59 | 25/36 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 7/13 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 54% |
Miyoshi managed to score 5 aces . Montes-De La Torre scored 1 ace . Miyoshi won 69% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Montes-De La Torre won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Miyoshi | Montes-De La Torre |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 29% | 38% |
| Conceded | 16 | 5 |
| Saved | 11 | 4 |
| % Saved | 69% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Kenta broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Kenta dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Inaki broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Montes-De La Torre conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Miyoshi | |||
| Q1 Brymer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 108-105 | 108-105 | |
| Total points | 213 | 213 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 59/104 | 59/104 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 41/59 | 41/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 22/45 | 22/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 11/16 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 69% | 69% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Montes-De La Torre | |||
| Q1 Okonkwo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 64-43 | 64-43 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 36/49 | 36/49 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 25/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
LLWWWWWWWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Benjamin LockLock (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Nick ChappellChappell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Theo ArribageArribage (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Alafia AyeniAyeni (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- August HolmgrenHolmgren – Nathan PonwithPonwith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hunter HeckHeck – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karlis OzolinsOzolins – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
