Jason Jung and Yuki Mochizuki will play each other in the qualifications of the Kobe Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT B. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jason Jung is the pick to win this match.
Jason Jung -> 1.41
Yuki Mochizuki -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Yuki Mochizuki
There is no head to head record between Jason Jung and Yuki Mochizuki since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 422, the Chinese got to the qualifications after beating Keisuke Saitoh 4-6 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications against Saitoh, Jung recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-3). During the match, Jung scored 86 points vs Saitoh’s 80. Jung was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jung recorded 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jason Jung lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Jung put 63% of his first serves in, winning 74% (37/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (13/30) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Saitoh 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Jung has good record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (326-262). 2-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has an aggregate 40-36 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The Chinese has an aggregate 22-25 win-loss record in 2022, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kobe Challenger
Yuki Mochizuki
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-11 | 9-9 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-26 | 21-23 | 9-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-20 | 18-12 | 14-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-8 | 15-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 555, Mochizuki reached the qualifications after beating Ergi Kirkin 3-6 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications against Kirkin, Yuki recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-4). During the match Mochizuki scored 106 points vs Kirkin’s 105. The Japanese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Mochizuki managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Yuki Mochizuki lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Mochizuki put 73% of his first serves in, winning 64% (43/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (13/25) on the 2nd serve. Yuki broke Kirkin 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Mochizuki’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Antalya.
The Japanese has an aggregate 31-18 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 31 |
| Pts | 86-80 | 106-105 |
| Total Points | 166 | 211 |
| Winners | 37 | 43 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Jung and Mochizuki played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Jason Jung surrendered 1 set, while Yuki Mochizuki surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Jung and Mochizuki have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Jung played 3 games less than Mochizuki. Jason scored 37 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese blasted 43 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 50/80 | 67/92 |
| %1st in | 63% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 43/67 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | 13/25 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 52% |
Jung scored 2 aces . Mochizuki struck 4 aces . Jung won 74% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Mochizuki won 64% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 38% | 38% |
| Conceded | 4 | 12 |
| Saved | 1 | 8 |
| % Saved | 25% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Jung broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jason surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Yuki broke his opponent 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Mochizuki conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Saitoh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 86-80 | 86-80 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 50/80 | 50/80 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 37/50 | 37/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/30 | 13/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Mochizuki | |||
| Q1 Kirkin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 106-105 | 106-105 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 43 | 43 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 67/92 | 67/92 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 43/67 | 43/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 13/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LLWWLWWLWW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Shinji HazawaHazawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Renta TokudaTokuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Tatsuma ItoIto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – John MillmanMillman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
