Marc Polmans and Renta Tokuda will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Kobe Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT C. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc Polmans who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc Polmans is the pick to win this match.
Marc Polmans -> 1.48
Renta Tokuda -> 2.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc Polmans vs. Renta Tokuda
There is no head to head record between Marc Polmans and Renta Tokuda since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Marc Polmans
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-24 | 10-15 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 374, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Hikaru Shiraishi 7-5 4-6 6-0.
In the qualifications, Polmans defeated Shiraishi (7-5 4-6 6-0). During the match, Polmans scored 90 points vs Shiraishi’s 76. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Polmans bagged 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marc Polmans lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Polmans put 56% of his first serves in, winning 77% (41/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 49% (20/41) on the 2nd serve. Marc broke Shiraishi 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Polmans has favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (262-207). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Polmans has an aggregate 7-14 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Polmans’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Sydney Challenger.
Polmans has an aggregate 14-11 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kobe Challenger
Marc has never competed in this tournament before.
Renta Tokuda
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-16 | 24-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 7-10 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-13 | 30-9 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 748, the Japanese got to the qualifications after defeating Ji Sung Nam 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Renta had a good straight sets win against Sung Nam (6-4 6-1). During the match Tokuda scored 78 points vs Sung Nam’s 62. Renta was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Tokuda made 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Renta Tokuda lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Tokuda put 69% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (9/21) on the 2nd serve. The Japanese broke Sung Nam 5 times after converting 28% of his break points (5/18).
Renta’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Jakarta.
Tokuda has an aggregate 7-8 win-loss record in 2022, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Polmans | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 17 |
| Pts | 90-76 | 78-62 |
| Total Points | 166 | 140 |
| Winners | 41 | 31 |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% |
Both Polmans and Tokuda played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Marc Polmans dropped 1 set while Renta Tokuda hasn’t conceded a set so far. Polmans has played 1 set more than Tokuda (3 vs 2). Therefore, Polmans played 11 games more than Tokuda. The Australian scored 41 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Renta scored 31 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Polmans | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 2 |
| 1st in | 53/94 | 47/68 |
| %1st in | 56% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 31/47 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 9/21 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 43% |
Polmans managed to score 9 aces . Tokuda blasted 2 aces . Polmans won 77% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Tokuda won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Polmans | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/18 |
| % Converted | 63% | 28% |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 |
| Saved | 4 | 7 |
| % Saved | 67% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Polmans surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Renta broke his opponent 5 times with a 28% conversion rate. Tokuda conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Polmans | |||
| Q1 Shiraishi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 90-76 | 90-76 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 53/94 | 53/94 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 41/53 | 41/53 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/41 | 20/41 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Tokuda | |||
| Q1 Sung Nam |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 78-62 | 78-62 | |
| Total points | 140 | 140 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 47/68 | 47/68 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 31/47 | 31/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/21 | 9/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/18 | 5/18 | |
| Converted % | 28% | 28% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWLLWL
LWLWLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Shinji HazawaHazawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Taisei IchikawaIchikawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Renta TokudaTokuda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Shintaro ImaiImai – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yunseong ChungChung – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Tatsuma ItoIto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki MochizukiMochizuki – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu – John MillmanMillman (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Colin SinclairSinclair (0-0) – H2H and prediction
