Daniel Altmaier and Felipe Meligeni Alves will play each other in the 2nd round of the Montevideo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Altmaier who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Altmaier is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Altmaier -> 1.43
Felipe Meligeni Alves -> 2.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Daniel Altmaier vs. Felipe Meligeni Alves
There is no head to head record between Daniel Altmaier and Felipe Meligeni Alves since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Daniel Altmaier
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 17-16 | 5-8 | 7-4 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 30-34 | 5-9 | 19-20 | 5-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-31 | 8-13 | 21-10 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-31 | 10-14 | 22-12 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-27 | 7-3 | 36-20 | 5-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 80, Altmaier got to the 2nd round after beating Juan Bautista Torres 6-2 6-2.
In the 1st round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Bautista Torres (6-2 6-2). During the match, Altmaier scored 57 points vs Bautista Torres’s 37. Altmaier was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about the service games, Altmaier scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Daniel Altmaier was quite effective on serve to win 72% (21/29) of his 1st serve and 52% (11/21) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Daniel broke Bautista Torres 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Altmaier has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (326-189). 20-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Altmaier has a compiled153-94 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Altmaier’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Phoenix Challenger,the Heilbronn Challenger,the Lima 2 Challenger and the Guayaquil Challenger.
The German has a compiled 32-30 win-loss record in 2022, 20-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montevideo Challenger
Altmaier has never competed in this tournament before.
Felipe Meligeni Alves
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15-8 | 1-3 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 36-28 | 4-8 | 29-17 | 0-1 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-29 | 8-6 | 26-22 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-29 | 0-3 | 33-25 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-28 | 1-2 | 33-25 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 164, Felipe got to the 2nd round after defeating Sumit Nagal 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Meligeni had a good straight sets win against Nagal (6-4 6-3). During the match Meligeni scored 56 points vs Nagal’s 43. The Brazilian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Meligeni wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Felipe Meligeni Alves was pretty efficient on serve to win 71% (27/38) of his 1st serve and 64% (7/11) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brazilian broke Nagal 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Meligeni’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Iasi Challenger.
The Brazilian has an overall 30-27 win-loss record in 2022, 30-23 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montevideo Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Altmaier | Meligeni |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 19 |
| Pts | 57-37 | 56-43 |
| Total Points | 94 | 99 |
| Winners | 21 | 27 |
| %Winners | 37% | 48% |
Both Altmaier and Meligeni played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Altmaier and Meligeni have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Altmaier played 3 games less than Meligeni. Daniel scored 21 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Meligeni blasted 27 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Altmaier | Meligeni |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 38/49 |
| %1st in | 58% | 78% |
| 1st pts | 21/29 | 27/38 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 7/11 |
| %2nd pts | 52% | 64% |
Altmaier fired 1 ace . Meligeni didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Altmaier won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Meligeni won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Altmaier | Meligeni |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/7 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 71% | 50% |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 50% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Altmaier broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Altmaier surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Meligeni broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brazilian conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Altmaier | |||
| R1 Bautista |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 57-37 | 57-37 | |
| Total points | 94 | 94 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/50 | 29/50 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/21 | 11/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Meligeni | |||
| R1 Nagal |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 56-43 | 56-43 | |
| Total points | 99 | 99 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 38/49 | 38/49 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 27/38 | 27/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWW
WWWWWLLWWW Tennis Scores in Montevideo Challenger
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 7-69) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-3 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Gastao EliasElias – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (5-7 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Federico ZeballosZeballos (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Leo BorgBorg (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves – Sumit NagalNagal (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Guido PellaPella (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 7-6(9)) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo BagnisBagnis – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
