Liam Broady and Maximilian Marterer will play each other in the 2nd round of the Bratislava Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 3:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maximilian Marterer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Maximilian Marterer is the pick to win this match.
Maximilian Marterer -> 1.88
Liam Broady -> 1.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Liam Broady vs. Maximilian Marterer
This will be the 3rd time that Liam Broady and Maximilian Marterer square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Marterer (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Marterer won 6-4 7-6(6) in the 2nd round in the Bratislava Challenger back in 2021.
Liam Broady
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-28 | 23-9 | 2-4 | 15-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-25 | 16-9 | 2-5 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-26 | 19-10 | 7-5 | 16-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 2-4 | 9-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 157, Liam reached the 2nd round after defeating Flavio Cobolli 7-64 6-0.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Cobolli (7-64 6-0). During the match, Broady scored 75 points vs Cobolli’s 57. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Broady scored 3 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Liam Broady was very effective on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 53% (9/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Liam broke Cobolli 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Broady has positive match record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (388-268). 10-4 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Broady has a compiled 97-64 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Liam’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Phoenix Challenger.
Liam has a compiled 36-24 win-loss record in 2022, 10-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Maximilian Marterer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10-19 | 3-5 | 5-8 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-27 | 12-10 | 13-10 | 12-4 | 5-2 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 39-28 | 11-7 | 17-15 | 7-5 | 4-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-28 | 4-2 | 15-16 | 7-7 | 0-1 | 3-2 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 0-2 | 9-6 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
Ranked no. 158, the German got to the 2nd round after defeating Jelle Sels 7-69 6-2.
In the 1st round, Marterer had a good straight sets win against Sels (7-69 6-2). During the match Marterer scored 74 points vs Sels’s 57. Marterer was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Marterer bagged 5 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Maximilian Marterer was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 80% (12/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The German broke Sels 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
The German’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Braunschweig Challenger.
Maximilian has a compiled 37-26 win-loss record in 2022, 5-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Broady | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
| Pts | 75-57 | 74-57 |
| Total Points | 132 | 131 |
| Winners | 33 | 34 |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% |
Both Broady and Marterer played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Broady and Marterer have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Broady played 2 games less than Marterer. The Brit scored 33 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Marterer recorded 34 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Broady | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 5 |
| 1st in | 42/59 | 47/62 |
| %1st in | 71% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 33/42 | 34/47 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 12/15 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 80% |
Broady recorded 3 aces . Marterer fired 5 aces . Broady won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Marterer won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 80% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Broady | Marterer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 60% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Broady pretty effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Maximilian broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Marterer conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Broady | |||
| R1 Cobolli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 75-57 | 75-57 | |
| Total points | 132 | 132 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 42/59 | 42/59 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 33/42 | 33/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/17 | 9/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Marterer | |||
| R1 Sels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 74-57 | 74-57 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/62 | 47/62 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 12/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWLLLW
LLWWLLWLWL Tennis Scores in Bratislava Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Vit KoprivaKopriva (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Zizou BergsBergs (6-73 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-65 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – Lukas RosolRosol (6-3 6-74 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (7-67 7-5) – See score progression
- Marton FucsovicsFucsovics – Lukas PokornyPokorny (7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Flavio CobolliCobolli (7-64 6-0) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jelle SelsSels (7-69 6-2) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Jakub MensikMensik (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Vit KoprivaKopriva (7-6(5) 7-6(3)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Norbert GombosGombos – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Liam BroadyBroady (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jurij RodionovRodionov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
