Jan Choinski and Damien Wenger will face off in the qualifications of the Montevideo Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 3:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jan Choinski who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jan Choinski is the pick to win this match.
Jan Choinski -> 1.37
Damien Wenger -> 2.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jan Choinski vs. Damien Wenger
There is no head to head record between Jan Choinski and Damien Wenger since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Jan Choinski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-19 | 1-2 | 10-8 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 265, Choinski got to the qualifications after beating Juan Martin Fumeaux 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Jan had a good straight sets win against Martin Fumeaux (6-3 6-2). During the match, Choinski scored 67 points vs Martin Fumeaux’s 44. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Choinski struck 4 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Jan Choinski conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Choinski put 63% of his first serves in, winning 69% (25/36) of the points behind his 1st serve and 81% (17/21) on the 2nd serve. Jan broke Martin Fumeaux 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Choinski has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (293-182). 29-11 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Choinski has a compiled151-84 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
The German’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Frankfurt am Main and the Campinas Challenger.
Choinski has an overall 40-18 win-loss record in 2022, 29-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Montevideo Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Damien Wenger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 16-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 387, Damien reached the qualifications after defeating Federico Aguilar Cardozo 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Aguilar Cardozo (6-3 6-2). During the match Wenger scored 62 points vs Aguilar Cardozo’s 46. The Swiss was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Wenger couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 4 double faults. Damien Wenger lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Wenger put 62% of his first serves in, winning 65% (24/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Damien broke Aguilar Cardozo 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Damien’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Budva,M25 Caslano and M25 Maribor.
The Swiss has a compiled 44-21 win-loss record in 2022, 44-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Choinski | Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 |
| Pts | 67-44 | 62-46 |
| Total Points | 111 | 108 |
| Winners | 25 | 24 |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% |
Both Choinski and Wenger played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Choinski and Wenger have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (17). The German scored 25 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Damien recorded 24 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Choinski | Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 0 |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 37/60 |
| %1st in | 63% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 24/37 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 11/23 |
| %2nd pts | 81% | 48% |
Choinski managed to score 4 aces . Wenger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Choinski won 69% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 81% of the points. On the other side, Wenger won 65% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Choinski | Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 6/8 |
| % Converted | 38% | 75% |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Jan broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jan was rock solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Swiss broke his opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Choinski | |||
| Q1 Martin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 67-44 | 67-44 | |
| Total points | 111 | 111 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 36/57 | 36/57 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 25/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/21 | 17/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 81% | 81% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Wenger | |||
| Q1 Aguilar |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-46 | 62-46 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 24/37 | 24/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLLWW
LLWWWLWWLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Franco AgamenoneAgamenone (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Gastao EliasElias (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Federico ZeballosZeballos (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Damien WengerWenger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Guido PellaPella (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
