David Poljak and Arthur Fery will face off in the qualifications of the Calgary Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on NATIONAL BANK COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Arthur Fery who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Arthur Fery is the pick to win this match.
Arthur Fery -> 1.533
David Poljak -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head David Poljak vs. Arthur Fery
There is no head to head record between David Poljak and Arthur Fery since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
David Poljak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-22 | 7-4 | 5-5 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 6-4 | 8-10 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-28 | 15-12 | 12-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 16-7 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 440, Poljak got to the qualifications after defeating Benjamin Sigouin 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Czech had a good straight sets win against Sigouin (6-3 6-2). During the match, Poljak scored 64 points vs Sigouin’s 44. David was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Poljak scored 15 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. David Poljak was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (30/38) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Czech broke Sigouin 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Poljak has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 56% of his matches (283-222). 22-10 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Poljak has a composed40-31 record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
David’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in Sultan.
David has a compiled 36-25 win-loss record in 2022, 22-10 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Calgary Challenger
David has never competed in this tournament before.
Arthur Fery
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-14 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 1-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-15 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 15-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-13 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 14-5 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-14 | 7-6 | 7-4 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 473, the Brit got to the qualifications after defeating Joshua Lapadat 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Lapadat (6-2 6-3). During the match Fery scored 62 points vs Lapadat’s 45. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Fery managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Arthur Fery lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fery put 57% of his first serves in, winning 75% (21/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (7/21) on the 2nd serve. Fery broke Lapadat 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Arthur’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Nottingham,M25 Sheffield and M25 Sunderland.
The Brit has an overall 22-11 win-loss record in 2022, 12-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Poljak | Fery |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 |
| Pts | 64-44 | 62-45 |
| Total Points | 108 | 107 |
| Winners | 30 | 21 |
| %Winners | 47% | 34% |
Both Poljak and Fery played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Poljak and Fery have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (17). The Czech scored 30 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Fery struck 21 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Poljak | Fery |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 15 | 5 |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 28/49 |
| %1st in | 62% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 21/28 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 7/21 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 33% |
Poljak managed to score 15 aces . Fery struck 5 aces . Poljak won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Fery won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Poljak | Fery |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 6 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 75% | 67% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Czech broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. David quite strong on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. The Brit broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Poljak | |||
| Q1 Sigouin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-44 | 64-44 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 15 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 38/61 | 38/61 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 30/38 | 30/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Fery | |||
| Q1 Lapadat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-45 | 62-45 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 28/49 | 28/49 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/21 | 7/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWLLWW
LWWWLWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Harold MayotMayot (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian NeuchristNeuchrist – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Valentin VacherotVacherot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Aziz DougazDougaz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michail PervolarakisPervolarakis – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Alfredo PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Justin BoulaisBoulais – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Julian OcleppoOcleppo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
