Giles Hussey and Patrick Kypson will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Knoxville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.35
Giles Hussey -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Giles Hussey vs. Patrick Kypson
There is no head to head record between Giles Hussey and Patrick Kypson since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Giles Hussey
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-15 | 29-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 19-11 | 0-0 | 18-7 | 0-3 | 3-2 |
| 2022 | 30-25 | 16-11 | 0-1 | 12-8 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-15 | 23-10 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 518, Hussey reached the qualifications after defeating Andrew Rogers 7-5 4-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Brit defeated Rogers (7-5 4-6 6-1). During the match, Hussey scored 98 points vs Rogers’s 80. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Hussey managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Giles Hussey lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Hussey put 52% of his first serves in, winning 65% (28/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (27/40) on the 2nd serve. Hussey broke Rogers 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Hussey has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (75-46). 11-6 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Hussey has a compiled11-6 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Hussey’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Roehampton and M25 Sheffield.
The Brit has a composed 29-23 win-loss record in 2022, 11-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Knoxville Challenger
Hussey has never competed in this tournament before.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-16 | 5-6 | 4-7 | 5-0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 569, Kypson reached the qualifications after defeating Roy Smith 7-64 5-2 ret..
In the qualifications against Smith, Kypson had a free pass after Smith retired on a 7-64 5-2 . scoreline.
Patrick’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Champaign,M25 Edwardsville and Augustin.
Kypson has an aggregate 23-12 win-loss record in 2022, 8-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Hussey | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 20 |
| Pts | 98-80 | 67-58 |
| Total Points | 178 | 125 |
| Winners | 28 | 32 |
| %Winners | 29% | 48% |
Both Hussey and Kypson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Giles Hussey lost 1 set while Patrick Kypson hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Talking about their workload, Hussey and Kypson have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Hussey played 9 games more than Kypson. The Brit scored 28 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Patrick blasted 32 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Hussey | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 5 |
| 1st in | 43/83 | 43/61 |
| %1st in | 52% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 32/43 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 27/40 | 12/18 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 67% |
Hussey struck 2 aces . Kypson blasted 5 aces . Hussey won 65% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Hussey | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 2 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 2/5 |
| % Converted | 50% | 40% |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 2 |
| % Saved | 71% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Giles broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Kypson broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Hussey | |||
| Q1 Rogers |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 98-80 | 98-80 | |
| Total points | 178 | 178 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 43/83 | 43/83 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 28/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/40 | 27/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Kypson | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 5-2 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-58 | 67-58 | |
| Total points | 125 | 125 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 43/61 | 43/61 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/18 | 12/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLWLW
LWLWLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Donald YoungYoung – Tristan MccormickMccormick (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Emilio NavaNava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sekou BangouraBangoura – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Theo ArribageArribage – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
