Patrick Maloney and Strong Kirchheimer will face off in the qualifications of the Knoxville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Strong Kirchheimer who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Strong Kirchheimer is the pick to win this match.
Strong Kirchheimer -> 1.727
Patrick Maloney -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Patrick Maloney vs. Strong Kirchheimer
There is no head to head record between Patrick Maloney and Strong Kirchheimer since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Patrick Maloney
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-8 | 10-3 | 7-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Maloney reached the qualifications after defeating Peter Bertran 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Maloney had a good straight sets win against Bertran (6-2 6-3). During the match, Maloney scored 60 points vs Bertran’s 33. Maloney was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Maloney blasted 10 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Patrick Maloney was pretty effective on serve to win 96% (25/26) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Maloney broke Bertran 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Maloney has a solid match record in the last 1 years having won 67% of his matches (18-9). 7-3 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Maloney has a compiled7-3 record in the last 1 years on indoor hard courts.
Maloney’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Columbus.
Maloney has a compiled 18-9 win-loss record in 2022, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Knoxville Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Strong Kirchheimer
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-16 | 9-8 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-29 | 19-16 | 2-4 | 17-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-30 | 17-12 | 7-11 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-21 | 12-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 488, the American reached the qualifications after beating Enzo Wallart 6-2 1-0 ret..
In the qualifications against Wallart, Kirchheimer had a free pass after Wallart retired on a 6-2 1-0 . scoreline.
Kirchheimer’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Harlingen.
Kirchheimer has a composed 29-28 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Maloney | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 9 |
| Pts | 60-33 | 38-25 |
| Total Points | 93 | 63 |
| Winners | 25 | 8 |
| %Winners | 42% | 21% |
Both Maloney and Kirchheimer played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Maloney has played 1 set(s) less than Kirchheimer (2 vs 3). However, it’s interesting to notice that Maloney played 8 games more than Kirchheimer. Maloney scored 25 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Kirchheimer made 8 winners (21%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Maloney | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 1 |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 13/26 |
| %1st in | 65% | 50% |
| 1st pts | 25/26 | 8/13 |
| %1st pts | 96% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 8/13 |
| %2nd pts | 79% | 62% |
Maloney scored 10 aces . Kirchheimer made 1 ace . Maloney won 96% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 79% of the points. On the other side, Kirchheimer won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Maloney | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 4 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 38% | 67% |
| Conceded | 0 | 3 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Maloney broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American very solid his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Strong conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Maloney | |||
| Q1 Bertran |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 60-33 | 60-33 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 26/40 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 25/26 | 25/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 96% | 96% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kirchheimer | |||
| Q1 Wallart |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 1-0 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 9 | 9 | |
| pts | 38-25 | 38-25 | |
| Total points | 63 | 63 | |
| Winners | 8 | 8 | |
| %Winners | 21% | 21% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 13/26 | 13/26 | |
| % 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
| 1st pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLLWWW
LWLWLWWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Emilio NavaNava (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sekou BangouraBangoura – Luca MargaroliMargaroli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Patrick MaloneyMaloney (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Theo ArribageArribage – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cayetano MarchMarch – Tristan MccormickMccormick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Kiranpal PannuPannu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
