Vitaliy Sachko and Cem Ilkel will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Bratislava Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 3. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.86
Vitaliy Sachko -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Vitaliy Sachko vs. Cem Ilkel
There is no head to head record between Vitaliy Sachko and Cem Ilkel since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Vitaliy Sachko
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-13 | 3-3 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 47-32 | 4-3 | 28-16 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 24-33 | 2-3 | 12-18 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 42-28 | 0-2 | 24-17 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
| 2020 | 21-12 | 8-5 | 7-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 285, the Ukrainian got to the qualifications after beating Peter Nad 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Ukrainian had a good straight sets win against Nad (6-2 6-4). During the match, Sachko scored 62 points vs Nad’s 41. Vitaliy was very aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Regarding the service games, Sachko scored just 1 ace during the match and he committed only 1 double fault. Vitaliy Sachko was very efficient on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Vitaliy was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Nad 3 times.
Sachko has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (237-160). 5-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sachko has a composed31-20 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The Ukrainian has an overall 21-29 win-loss record in 2022, 5-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9-16 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 318, Ilkel got to the qualifications after defeating Denis Istomin 7-62 7-5.
In the qualifications, Cem had a good straight sets win against Istomin (7-62 7-5). During the match Ilkel scored 77 points vs Istomin’s 67. The Turk was very aggressive to blast 41 winners.
About the serving games, Ilkel made 5 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Cem Ilkel was quite efficient on serve to win 84% (41/49) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Turk broke Istomin once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
The Turk’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Vilnus Challenger.
The Turk has an overall 14-15 win-loss record in 2022, 12-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sachko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 25 |
| Pts | 62-41 | 77-67 |
| Total Points | 103 | 144 |
| Winners | 25 | 41 |
| %Winners | 40% | 53% |
Both Sachko and Ilkel played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Sachko and Ilkel have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Sachko played 7 games less than Ilkel. The Ukrainian scored 25 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Ilkel bagged 41 winners (53%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sachko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 49/68 |
| %1st in | 64% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 41/49 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 12/19 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 63% |
Sachko scored 1 ace . Ilkel also scored 5 aces . Sachko won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sachko | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 1 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 1/3 |
| % Converted | 100% | 33% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Sachko broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Sachko extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Cem broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. Ilkel was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Sachko | |||
| Q1 Nad |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 62-41 | 62-41 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 25/29 | 25/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Ilkel | |||
| Q1 Istomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 53% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 49/68 | 49/68 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 41/49 | 41/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLLWLLL
LLLLLWLLLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Lukas RosolRosol – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Vit KoprivaKopriva (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jelle SelsSels – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Tomas MachacMachac (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Karl FribergFriberg – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
