Jason Jung and Ji Sung Nam will square off in the qualifications of the Matsuyama Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 8. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ji Sung Nam who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ji Sung Nam is the pick to win this match.
Ji Sung Nam -> 1.86
Jason Jung -> 1.86
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Ji Sung Nam
This will be the 2nd time that Jason Jung and Ji Sung Nam square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Sung Nam (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Sung Nam won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in USA F6.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 438, Jung got to the qualifications after defeating Shunsuke Nakagawa 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Chinese had a good straight sets win against Nakagawa (6-1 6-1). During the match, Jung scored 57 points vs Nakagawa’s 26. Jason was quite aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jung scored just 1 ace in the encounter and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Jason Jung was extremely effective on serve to win 76% (16/21) of his 1st serve and 77% (10/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jason broke Nakagawa 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Jung has winning match record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (322-261). 9-11 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has a compiled 226-160 match record in the last years on hard.
Jason has an aggregate 18-24 win-loss record in 2022, 9-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Matsuyama Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Ji Sung Nam
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-7 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 15-20 | 13-15 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-19 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-7 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 479, Ji reached the qualifications after defeating Jonathan Mridha 7-62 6-3.
In the qualifications, Sung Nam had a good straight sets win against Mridha (7-62 6-3). During the match Sung Nam scored 83 points vs Mridha’s 68. Ji was very aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about serving, Sung Nam made 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ji Sung Nam lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Sung Nam put 72% of his first serves in, winning 79% (37/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Sung Nam broke Mridha 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Sung Nam’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Chiang Rai.
Sung Nam has a composed 26-17 win-loss record in 2022, 24-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 22 |
| Pts | 57-26 | 83-68 |
| Total Points | 83 | 151 |
| Winners | 16 | 37 |
| %Winners | 28% | 45% |
Both Jung and Sung Nam played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jung and Sung Nam have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Jung played 8 games less than Sung Nam. Jung scored 16 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, The Korean blasted 37 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 21/34 | 47/65 |
| %1st in | 62% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 16/21 | 37/47 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 9/18 |
| %2nd pts | 77% | 50% |
Jung scored 1 ace . Sung Nam also recorded 4 aces . Jung won 76% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 77% of the points. On the other side, Sung Nam won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 3 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 3/14 |
| % Converted | 55% | 21% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 4 |
| % Saved | 0% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Jason broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. Jason surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Korean broke his opponent 3 times with a 21% conversion rate. Ji conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | |||
| Q1 Nakagawa |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 57-26 | 57-26 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 16 | 16 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 16/21 | 16/21 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/13 | 10/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 77% | 77% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Sung Nam | |||
| Q1 Mridha |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-62 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 83-68 | 83-68 | |
| Total points | 151 | 151 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 47/65 | 47/65 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 37/47 | 37/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 3/14 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 21% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLW
LWLLWWWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yuichi SugitaSugita – Nam Hoang LyHoang Ly (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi – Makoto OchiOchi (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – John MillmanMillman (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kaichi UchidaUchida – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Rimpei KawakamiKawakami (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Shinji HazawaHazawa (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Naoki NakagawaNakagawa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Sho KatayamaKatayama (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dane SweenySweeny – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
