Ben Shelton and Paul Jubb will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 5:00 pm on BRENDA MYERS COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ben Shelton who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ben Shelton is the pick to win this match.
Ben Shelton -> 1.39
Paul Jubb -> 2.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ben Shelton vs. Paul Jubb
This will be the 2nd time that Ben Shelton and Paul Jubb square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Shelton (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Shelton won 6-1 6-2 in the quarter in M25 Champaign back in 2021.
Ben Shelton
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-22 | 21-12 | 8-4 | 3-2 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-26 | 21-13 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-11 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 24-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-7 | 7-3 | 5-2 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 156 (career-high), Shelton reached the semifinal after defeating Chris Rodesch 6-4 6-3, Brandon Holt 6-3 6-4 and Lucas Gerch 6-3 7-5.
In the quarter, The American had a good straight sets win against Gerch (6-3 7-5). During the match, Shelton scored 75 points vs Gerch’s 62. Shelton was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Shelton struck 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Ben Shelton was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (34/47) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Gerch twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The American hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Shelton has a fantastic record in the last 2 years having won 72% of his matches (46-18). 12-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Shelton has an aggregate18-4 match record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
Shelton’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Rome Challenger,the Chicago Challenger and the Tiburon Challenger.
The American has a compiled 28-11 win-loss record in 2022, 12-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-24 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 9-4 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 220, Jubb got to the semifinal after defeating Aidan Mchugh 6-74 6-3 6-3, Michael Mmoh 7-64 6-3 and Inaki Montes-De La Torre 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Montes-De La Torre (6-3 6-2). During the match Jubb scored 64 points vs Montes-De La Torre’s 51. The Brit was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Jubb fired 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 60% of his first serves in, winning 63% (22/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the 2nd serve. Jubb broke Montes-De La Torre 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Brit has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Paul’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger.
The Brit has a compiled 31-23 win-loss record in 2022, 11-5 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shelton | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 59 | 70 |
| Pts | 203-159 | 257-225 |
| Total Points | 362 | 482 |
| Winners | 92 | 101 |
| %Winners | 45% | 39% |
Both Shelton and Jubb played 3 matches. At the moment, Paul Jubb conceded 1 set while Ben Shelton hasn’t conceded a set so far. Shelton has played 1 set(s) less than Jubb (6 vs 7). Therefore, Shelton played 11 games less than Jubb. Ben scored 92 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit struck 101 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shelton | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 23 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 7.7 | 2.3 |
| 1st in | 117/185 | 148/233 |
| %1st in | 63% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 92/117 | 101/148 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 68% |
| 2nd pts | 44/68 | 52/85 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 61% |
Shelton managed to score 23 aces (7.7 per match). Jubb struck 7 aces (2.3 per match). Shelton won 79% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 68% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shelton | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 12 |
| Converted | 6/16 | 12/34 |
| % Converted | 38% | 35% |
| Conceded | 2 | 14 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 71% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 4 |
The American broke his opponents 6 times with a 38% conversion rate. Shelton extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. Paul broke his opponents 12 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded.
| Shelton | |||||
| R1 Rodesch |
R2 Holt |
1/4 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | 21 | 59 | |
| pts | 61-44 | 67-53 | 75-62 | 203-159 | |
| Total points | 105 | 120 | 137 | 362 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | 34 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 43% | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 10 | 5 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 34/55 | 36/60 | 47/70 | 117/185 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 67% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 29/34 | 29/36 | 34/47 | 92/117 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 81% | 72% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/21 | 15/24 | 15/23 | 44/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 63% | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/9 | 2/3 | 6/16 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 22% | 67% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 100% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| R1 Mchugh |
R2 Mmoh |
1/4 Montes-De La Torre |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-74 6-3 6-3 | 7-64 6-3 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 22 | 17 | 70 | |
| pts | 118-107 | 75-67 | 64-51 | 257-225 | |
| Total points | 225 | 142 | 115 | 482 | |
| Winners | 37 | 42 | 22 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 56% | 34% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 59/96 | 54/79 | 35/58 | 148/233 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 68% | 60% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 37/59 | 42/54 | 22/35 | 101/148 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 78% | 63% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/37 | 14/25 | 14/23 | 52/85 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 56% | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 6/19 | 1/4 | 5/11 | 12/34 | |
| Converted % | 32% | 25% | 45% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 | 4 | 14 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 4/4 | 3/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWLLWWL
LWLLWLWWLW Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Julian Cash/Henry PattenCash/Henry Patten – Andre Goransson/Ben McLachlanGoransson/Ben McLachlan (7-64 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio NavaNava – Christopher EubanksEubanks (0-0) – H2H and prediction
