Daniel Altmaier and Jesper De Jong will face off in the quarter of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 1:00 pm on CANCHA RAUL VIVER. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Altmaier who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Altmaier is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Altmaier -> 1.34
Jesper De Jong -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Altmaier vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Daniel Altmaier and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Daniel Altmaier
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-20 | 5-6 | 13-14 | 0-0 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-31 | 8-13 | 21-10 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 34-31 | 10-14 | 22-12 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 49-27 | 7-3 | 36-20 | 5-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-16 | 12-7 | 13-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 91, Daniel got to the quarter after beating Thiago Seyboth Wild 1-6 7-65 6-2 and Juan Bautista Torres 6-4 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Bautista Torres (6-4 6-3). During the match, Altmaier scored 68 points vs Bautista Torres’s 56. The German was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about the service games, Altmaier bagged 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Daniel Altmaier was exceptionally effective on serve to win 82% (31/38) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Daniel broke Bautista Torres twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Altmaier has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Altmaier has a solid win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (322-189). 16-11 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Altmaier has a compiled149-94 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Altmaier’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Phoenix Challenger,the Heilbronn Challenger and the Lima 2 Challenger.
Daniel has a composed 28-30 win-loss record in 2022, 16-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Altmaier has never competed in this tournament before.
Jesper De Jong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-16 | 7-3 | 20-10 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-23 | 19-4 | 30-14 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-28 | 12-7 | 10-13 | 2-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-29 | 2-6 | 27-18 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 31-12 | 7-3 | 14-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 249, the Dutch reached the quarter after beating Hernan Casanova 6-1 6-75 7-5 and Franco Agamenone 6-2 4-6 6-4.
In the 2nd round, De defeated Agamenone (6-2 4-6 6-4). During the match De scored 96 points vs Agamenone’s 86. De was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, De recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jesper De Jong lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, De put 70% of his first serves in, winning 59% (40/68) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the 2nd serve. De broke Agamenone 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M25 Sintra.
The Dutch has a compiled 24-27 win-loss record in 2022, 10-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Altmaier | De |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 47 | 60 |
| Pts | 150-135 | 220-183 |
| Total Points | 285 | 403 |
| Winners | 61 | 95 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Altmaier and De played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Daniel Altmaier surrendered 1 set, while Jesper De Jong surrendered 2 sets. Altmaier has played 1 set(s) less than De (5 vs 6). Therefore, Altmaier played 13 games less than De. Altmaier scored 61 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch made 95 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Altmaier | De |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 77/130 | 141/199 |
| %1st in | 59% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 61/77 | 95/141 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 34/53 | 34/58 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 59% |
Altmaier made 13 aces (6.5 per match). De recorded 7 aces (3.5 per match). Altmaier won 79% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, De won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Altmaier | De |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 11/29 |
| % Converted | 31% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 15 |
| Saved | 5 | 9 |
| % Saved | 71% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Daniel broke his opponents 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Altmaier surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponents 11 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Altmaier | ||||
| R1 Seyboth |
R2 Bautista |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 7-65 6-2 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 19 | 47 | |
| pts | 82-79 | 68-56 | 150-135 | |
| Total points | 161 | 124 | 285 | |
| Winners | 30 | 31 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 46% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/73 | 38/57 | 77/130 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 67% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/39 | 31/38 | 61/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 82% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/34 | 11/19 | 34/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 58% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/5 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 40% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 2/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 100% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| De | ||||
| R1 Casanova |
R2 Agamenone |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-75 7-5 | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 28 | 60 | |
| pts | 124-97 | 96-86 | 220-183 | |
| Total points | 221 | 182 | 403 | |
| Winners | 55 | 40 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 42% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 2 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 73/102 | 68/97 | 141/199 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 70% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 55/73 | 40/68 | 95/141 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 59% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | 34/58 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/20 | 6/9 | 11/29 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 67% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 5/9 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 56% | 62% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWWWLWWW
LWWWWWWLWL Tennis Scores in Guayaquil Challenger
- Juan Pablo VarillasJuan – Nicolas KickerNicolas (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Federico CoriaCoria – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
