Juncheng Shang and Edan Leshem will square off in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 9. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juncheng Shang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juncheng Shang is the pick to win this match.
Juncheng Shang -> 1.43
Edan Leshem -> 2.74
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juncheng Shang vs. Edan Leshem
There is no head to head record between Juncheng Shang and Edan Leshem since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Juncheng Shang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-21 | 25-10 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 195 (career-high), the Chinese reached the 2nd round after defeating Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-4 3-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Chinese defeated Pablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 6-3). During the match, Shang scored 78 points vs Pablo Ficovich’s 72. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Shang bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Juncheng Shang was quite effective on serve to win 85% (40/47) of his 1st serve and 64% (16/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Juncheng broke Pablo Ficovich twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Shang has a solid match record in the last 2 years having won 69% of his matches (57-26). 6-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Shang has a composed6-2 match record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
The Chinese’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Naples,the Lexington Challenger and the Granby Challenger.
Shang has an overall 39-21 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
The Chinese has never competed in this tournament before.
Edan Leshem
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-17 | 6-8 | 1-1 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 33-20 | 0-0 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 24-19 | 19-13 | 0-2 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-12 | 2-7 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 389, Leshem got to the 2nd round after beating Pedro Rodenas 7-66 6-1, Martin Damm 6-4 6-4 and Alexis Galarneau 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Israeli had a good straight sets win against Galarneau (7-5 6-3). During the match Leshem scored 69 points vs Galarneau’s 58. Edan was quite aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Leshem made 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Edan Leshem lost the serve once. Furthermore, Leshem put 58% of his first serves in, winning 66% (21/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the 2nd serve. Edan broke Galarneau 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
The Israeli’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Nottingham,M15 Raanana and M25 Tbilisi.
Edan has an aggregate 39-27 win-loss record in 2022, 6-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Shang | Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 61 |
| Pts | 78-72 | 201-166 |
| Total Points | 150 | 367 |
| Winners | 40 | 77 |
| %Winners | 51% | 38% |
Shang played 1 match while Leshem competed in 3 matches. Leshem started his run from the qualifications while Shang had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Juncheng Shang conceded 1 set while Edan Leshem hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Shang has played 3 set(s) less than Leshem (3 vs 6). Therefore, Shang played 33 games less than Leshem. Shang scored 40 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, The Israeli recorded 77 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Shang | Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 47/72 | 110/190 |
| %1st in | 65% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 40/47 | 77/110 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 46/80 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 58% |
Shang scored 3 aces . Leshem blasted 12 aces (4 per match). Shang won 85% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Leshem won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Shang | Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 11 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 11/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 52% |
| Conceded | 3 | 12 |
| Saved | 2 | 8 |
| % Saved | 67% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Shang broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Chinese lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Edan broke his opponents 11 times with a 52% conversion rate. Edan conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Shang | |||
| R1 Pablo Ficovich |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 78-72 | 78-72 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 47/72 | 47/72 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 40/47 | 40/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/25 | 16/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Leshem | |||||
| Q1 Rodenas |
Q3 Damm |
R1 Galarneau |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 21 | 61 | |
| pts | 66-48 | 66-60 | 69-58 | 201-166 | |
| Total points | 114 | 126 | 127 | 367 | |
| Winners | 25 | 31 | 21 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 47% | 30% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 3 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 36/61 | 42/74 | 32/55 | 110/190 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 57% | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/36 | 31/42 | 21/32 | 77/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 74% | 66% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 17/32 | 17/23 | 46/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 53% | 74% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 2/2 | 4/9 | 11/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 100% | 44% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 6 | 1 | 12 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 6/6 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 100% | 0% | 140% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWWWWLW
LLLLW Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (7-64 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Paul JubbJubb – Michael MmohMmoh (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Aziz DougazDougaz (7-5 7-68) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis KudlaKudla – Ulises BlanchBlanch (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Edan LeshemLeshem – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
