Tristan Schoolkate and Luke Saville will face off in the 2nd round of the Sydney Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.75
Luke Saville -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Luke Saville
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Luke Saville since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-18 | 20-12 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 419, Schoolkate got to the 2nd round after defeating Omar Jasika 6-2 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Schoolkate defeated Jasika (6-2 1-6 6-3). During the match, Schoolkate scored 71 points vs Jasika’s 62. Tristan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Schoolkate made 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Australian broke Jasika 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Schoolkate has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 58% of his matches (77-56). 19-13 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has a compiled37-30 win-loss record in the last 4 years on hard.
Tristan’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Canberra and M15 Cairo.
The Australian has a composed 43-27 win-loss record in 2022, 19-13 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Luke Saville
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-15 | 10-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 43-26 | 28-18 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 14-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-11 | 18-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 638, Luke got to the 2nd round after defeating Corey Gaal 3-6 6-1 7-5, Kazuma Kawachi 7-62 6-1 and Ajeet Rai 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round, Saville had a good straight sets win against Rai (7-64 6-4). During the match Saville scored 86 points vs Rai’s 74. Luke was pretty aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Saville was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Luke Saville lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Saville put 57% of his first serves in, winning 81% (38/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 37% (13/35) on the 2nd serve. Saville broke Rai 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Saville has a compiled 15-8 win-loss record in 2022, 15-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 24 | 71 |
| Pts | 71-62 | 248-208 |
| Total Points | 133 | 456 |
| Winners | 28 | 110 |
| %Winners | 39% | 44% |
Schoolkate played 1 match while Saville competed in 3 matches. Saville started his run from the qualifications while Schoolkate had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Tristan Schoolkate lost 1 set, while Luke Saville surrendered 1 set. Schoolkate has played 4 set(s) less than Saville (3 vs 7). Therefore, Schoolkate played 47 games less than Saville. The Australian scored 28 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian managed to score 110 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 5.7 |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 143/231 |
| %1st in | 60% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 110/143 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 43/88 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 49% |
Schoolkate scored 9 aces . Saville fired 17 aces (5.7 per match). Schoolkate won 80% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Saville won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Schoolkate | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 11 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 11/26 |
| % Converted | 60% | 42% |
| Conceded | 2 | 17 |
| Saved | 0 | 11 |
| % Saved | 0% | 65% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 |
Tristan broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Tristan conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Saville broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.
| Schoolkate | |||
| R1 Jasika |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 71-62 | 71-62 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 35/58 | 35/58 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/23 | 14/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 61% | 61% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Saville | |||||
| Q1 Gaal |
Q3 Kawachi |
R1 Rai |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | 7-62 6-1 | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 20 | 23 | 71 | |
| pts | 97-83 | 65-51 | 86-74 | 248-208 | |
| Total points | 180 | 116 | 160 | 456 | |
| Winners | 39 | 33 | 38 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 51% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 6 | 0 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 2 | 5 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 52/84 | 44/65 | 47/82 | 143/231 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 68% | 57% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 33/44 | 38/47 | 110/143 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | 81% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 11/21 | 13/35 | 43/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 52% | 37% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/4 | 4/10 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 75% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 8 | 17 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3/4 | 5/8 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 75% | 63% | 198% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLWWW
LLWLLLLLWW Tennis Scores in Sydney Challenger
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (4-6 6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marek GengelGengel – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (7-64 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adam WaltonWalton – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-68 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (3-6 6-2 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Luke SavilleSaville – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle SeeligSeelig – Max PurcellPurcell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marek GengelGengel – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuichiro InuiInui – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
