Jan Choinski and Daniel Merida Aguilar will fight against each other in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 10:00 am on CANCHA 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jan Choinski who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jan Choinski is the pick to win this match.
Jan Choinski -> 1.49
Daniel Merida Aguilar -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jan Choinski vs. Daniel Merida Aguilar
There is no head to head record between Jan Choinski and Daniel Merida Aguilar since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Jan Choinski
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-29 | 4-3 | 22-15 | 3-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 41-35 | 1-4 | 30-19 | 5-5 | 2-5 | 3-2 |
2022 | 46-21 | 5-5 | 35-14 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 284, Choinski reached the qualifications after beating Boris Arias 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Arias (6-1 6-1). During the match, Choinski scored 64 points vs Arias’s 40. Choinski was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Choinski made 5 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Jan Choinski was extremely efficient on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 59% (10/17) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Arias 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Choinski has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (289-181). 25-10 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Choinski has a composed147-83 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Choinski’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Frankfurt am Main and the Campinas Challenger.
Choinski has an overall 36-17 win-loss record in 2022, 25-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Jan has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 52-28 | 14-8 | 38-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-31 | 16-13 | 20-17 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-26 | 8-9 | 21-16 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-14 | 1-4 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 482, Merida got to the qualifications after defeating Piotr Matuszewski 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Matuszewski (6-4 6-4). During the match Merida scored 65 points vs Matuszewski’s 52. Daniel was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Merida scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Daniel Merida Aguilar lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Merida put 62% of his first serves in, winning 82% (31/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (11/23) on the 2nd serve. Daniel was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Matuszewski 3 times.
Daniel’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Valldoreix.
The Spaniard has a composed 29-22 win-loss record in 2022, 21-12 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Choinski | Merida |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 14 | 20 |
Pts | 64-40 | 65-52 |
Total Points | 104 | 117 |
Winners | 22 | 31 |
%Winners | 34% | 48% |
Both Choinski and Merida played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Choinski and Merida have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Choinski played 6 games less than Merida. The German scored 22 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel bagged 31 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Choinski | Merida |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 1 |
Avg per match | 5 | 1 |
1st in | 31/48 | 38/61 |
%1st in | 65% | 62% |
1st pts | 22/31 | 31/38 |
%1st pts | 71% | 82% |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 11/23 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 48% |
Choinski bagged 5 aces . Merida managed to score 1 ace . Choinski won 71% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Merida won 82% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Choinski | Merida |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 3 |
Converted | 5/9 | 3/3 |
% Converted | 56% | 100% |
Conceded | 2 | 4 |
Saved | 2 | 3 |
% Saved | 100% | 75% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Choinski broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Jan very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 2 break points. The Spaniard broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. Merida conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
Choinski | |||
Q1 Arias |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 64-40 | 64-40 | |
Total points | 104 | 104 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 31/48 | 31/48 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 22/31 | 22/31 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
2nd pts | 10/17 | 10/17 | |
% 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Merida | |||
Q1 Matuszewski |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
Total points | 117 | 117 | |
Winners | 31 | 31 | |
%Winners | 48% | 48% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 38/61 | 38/61 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 31/38 | 31/38 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 11/23 | 11/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Guayaquil Challenger
- Marco CecchinatoMarco – Tomas Lipovsek PuchesTomas (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Cayetano MarchMarch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Andres AndradeAndrade (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-0) – H2H and prediction