Max Houkes and Blaise Bicknell will face off in the qualifications of the Guayaquil Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Max Houkes who should win in 2 sets.
Max Houkes -> 1.24
Blaise Bicknell -> 3.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Max Houkes vs. Blaise Bicknell
There is no head to head record between Max Houkes and Blaise Bicknell since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Max Houkes
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 40-15 | 0-0 | 40-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-33 | 1-1 | 39-30 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 70-20 | 0-0 | 70-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-16 | 2-2 | 30-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 28-11 | 7-3 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 374, Houkes reached the qualifications after defeating Ricardo Ledesma Candelo 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Ledesma Candelo (6-0 6-1). During the match, Houkes scored 50 points vs Ledesma Candelo’s 14. Max was extremely aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Regarding the service games, Houkes blasted 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Max Houkes was exceptionally effective on serve to win 95% (18/19) of his 1st serve and 70% (7/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Houkes broke Ledesma Candelo 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Houkes has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 68% of his matches (155-73). 60-15 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Houkes has a composed142-59 record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Dutch’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Innsbruck,M15 Kottingbrunn,M25 Oldenzaal,M15 Haren and M15 Casablanca.
The Dutch has an overall 60-15 win-loss record in 2022, 60-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Guayaquil Challenger
Max has never competed in this tournament before.
Blaise Bicknell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 12-17 | 9-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 34-16 | 22-9 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-22 | 13-10 | 15-9 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-9 | 8-6 | 4-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 805, the American reached the qualifications after defeating John Moncada Salazar 6-2 6-75 6-2.
In the qualifications, Bicknell defeated Moncada Salazar (6-2 6-75 6-2). During the match Bicknell scored 100 points vs Moncada Salazar’s 76. Blaise was extremely aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about serving, Bicknell struck 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Blaise Bicknell lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Bicknell put 62% of his first serves in, winning 87% (45/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. Blaise broke Moncada Salazar 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Bicknell’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Lubbock.
The American has an overall 26-17 win-loss record in 2022, 13-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Houkes | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 13 | 29 |
Pts | 50-14 | 100-76 |
Total Points | 64 | 176 |
Winners | 18 | 45 |
%Winners | 36% | 45% |
Both Houkes and Bicknell played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Blaise Bicknell dropped 1 set while Max Houkes hasn’t lost a set so far. Houkes has played 1 set(s) less than Bicknell (2 vs 3). Therefore, Houkes played 16 games less than Bicknell. Max scored 18 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Blaise blasted 45 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Houkes | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 5 |
Avg per match | 5 | 5 |
1st in | 19/29 | 52/84 |
%1st in | 66% | 62% |
1st pts | 18/19 | 45/52 |
%1st pts | 95% | 87% |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 16/32 |
%2nd pts | 70% | 50% |
Houkes recorded 5 aces . Bicknell made 5 aces . Houkes won 95% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 70% of the points. On the other side, Bicknell won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Houkes | Bicknell |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/7 | 5/9 |
% Converted | 86% | 56% |
Conceded | 0 | 3 |
Saved | 0 | 2 |
% Saved | 0% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Max broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. Max very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Bicknell broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Bicknell conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Houkes | |||
Q1 Ledesma | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
pts | 50-14 | 50-14 | |
Total points | 64 | 64 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 36% | 36% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 18/19 | 18/19 | |
% 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
2nd pts | 7/10 | 7/10 | |
% 2nd pts | 70% | 70% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Bicknell | |||
Q1 Moncada | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-75 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
pts | 100-76 | 100-76 | |
Total points | 176 | 176 | |
Winners | 45 | 45 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 52/84 | 52/84 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 45/52 | 45/52 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 16/32 | 16/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Cayetano MarchMarch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Francisco ComesanaComesana (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Tomas Lipovsek PuchesLipovsek Puches (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Jesper De JongDe Jong (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas AlvarezAlvarez – Eduardo RibeiroRibeiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Colin MarkesMarkes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Gerald MelzerMelzer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza – Andres AndradeAndrade (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max HoukesHoukes – (0-0) – H2H and prediction