Mark Whitehouse and Blake Mott will play each other in the qualifications of the Sydney Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Blake Mott who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Blake Mott is the pick to win this match.
Blake Mott -> 1.81
Mark Whitehouse -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mark Whitehouse vs. Blake Mott
There is no head to head record between Mark Whitehouse and Blake Mott since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Mark Whitehouse
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 13-26 | 7-14 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 34-33 | 25-21 | 0-0 | 2-6 | 7-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-18 | 7-10 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-9 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 675, Whitehouse reached the qualifications after beating Kody Pearson 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Whitehouse had a good straight sets win against Pearson (6-2 6-2). During the match, Whitehouse scored 65 points vs Pearson’s 43. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Whitehouse recorded 6 aces and he was pretty consistent in conceding no double faults. Mark Whitehouse was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (26/34) of his 1st serve and 78% (7/9) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Whitehouse broke Pearson 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Whitehouse has a winning record in the last 7 years having won 52% of his matches (127-117). 16-17 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Whitehouse has a composed80-70 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
The Brit’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in M15 Heraklion,M25 Roehampton and M15 Sharm ElSheikh.
Mark has a composed 25-29 win-loss record in 2022, 16-17 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sydney Challenger
Whitehouse has never competed in this tournament before.
Blake Mott
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-14 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-13 | 35-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-5 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 843, Blake got to the qualifications after defeating Edward Winter 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Blake had a good straight sets win against Winter (6-3 6-2). During the match Mott scored 62 points vs Winter’s 46. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Mott managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Blake Mott lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Mott put 76% of his first serves in, winning 76% (28/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (4/12) on the 2nd serve. Mott broke Winter 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
The Australian has an overall 8-3 win-loss record in 2022, 8-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Whitehouse | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 17 |
| Pts | 65-43 | 62-46 |
| Total Points | 108 | 108 |
| Winners | 26 | 28 |
| %Winners | 40% | 45% |
Both Whitehouse and Mott played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Whitehouse and Mott have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Whitehouse played 1 game less than Mott. Whitehouse scored 26 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian managed to score 28 winners (45%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Whitehouse | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 34/43 | 37/49 |
| %1st in | 79% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 28/37 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 4/12 |
| %2nd pts | 78% | 33% |
Whitehouse struck 6 aces . Mott blasted 5 aces . Whitehouse won 76% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Mott won 76% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 33% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Whitehouse | Mott |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/14 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 29% | 42% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 29% conversion rate. Whitehouse pretty solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Blake broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Blake conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Whitehouse | |||
| Q1 Pearson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 65-43 | 65-43 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/43 | 34/43 | |
| % 1st in | 79% | 79% | |
| 1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 78% | 78% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/14 | 4/14 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Mott | |||
| Q1 Winter |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 62-46 | 62-46 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 37/49 | 37/49 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 28/37 | 28/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWLWWL
LLWLLLWWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jose StathamStatham – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran – Max PurcellPurcell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Kazuma KawachiKawachi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan SmithSmith – Yuichiro InuiInui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Dane SweenySweeny (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Colin SinclairSinclair – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse – Blake MottMott (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Calum PuttergillPuttergill (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Adam WaltonWalton (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ajeet RaiRai – Mitchell HarperHarper (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeremy BealeBeale – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
