Tennys Sandgren and Jack Pinnington Jones will square off in the 2nd round of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tennys Sandgren who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tennys Sandgren is the pick to win this match.
Tennys Sandgren -> 1.51
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 2.49
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tennys Sandgren vs. Jack Pinnington Jones
There is no head to head record between Tennys Sandgren and Jack Pinnington Jones since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tennys Sandgren
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 4-4 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 20-19 | 0-1 | 7-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-23 | 19-11 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-24 | 5-12 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-13 | 7-5 | 5-3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 444, Sandgren got to the 2nd round after defeating Tristan Mccormick 6-1 7-67, Alexander Bernard 6-2 7-5 and Sebastian Fanselow 3-6 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round against Fanselow, Sandgren recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-5 6-3). During the match, Sandgren scored 97 points vs Fanselow’s 94. The American was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sandgren managed to score 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Tennys Sandgren lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Sandgren put 59% of his first serves in, winning 73% (40/55) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Fanselow 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Sandgren has positive record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (290-232). 15-11 on hard in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Sandgren has a composed 167-126 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Tennys has a composed 18-20 win-loss record in 2022, 15-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Jack Pinnington Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24-15 | 9-5 | 2-1 | 2-4 | 11-5 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 29-12 | 21-8 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 568, Pinnington reached the 2nd round after beating Edan Leshem 7-5 6-3, Nathan Ponwith 6-3 6-3 and Vasek Pospisil 6-4 3-6 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Pospisil (6-4 3-6 6-2). During the match Pinnington scored 93 points vs Pospisil’s 85. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Pinnington blasted 3 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Jack Pinnington Jones lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington put 49% of his first serves in, winning 70% (31/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (24/46) on the 2nd serve. Jack broke Pospisil 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
The Brit’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Pinnington has an aggregate 17-10 win-loss record in 2022, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Jack has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sandgren | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 70 | 66 |
| Pts | 240-203 | 233-197 |
| Total Points | 443 | 430 |
| Winners | 92 | 84 |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% |
Both Sandgren and Pinnington played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Tennys Sandgren dropped 1 set, while Jack Pinnington Jones lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Sandgren and Pinnington have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Sandgren played 4 games more than Pinnington. Sandgren scored 92 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Jack fired 84 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sandgren | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 24 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4 |
| 1st in | 118/210 | 114/207 |
| %1st in | 56% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 92/118 | 84/114 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 52/92 | 45/93 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 48% |
Sandgren made 24 aces (8 per match). Pinnington bagged 12 aces (4 per match). Sandgren won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Pinnington won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sandgren | Pinnington |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 15 |
| Converted | 10/34 | 15/25 |
| % Converted | 29% | 60% |
| Conceded | 15 | 18 |
| Saved | 11 | 10 |
| % Saved | 73% | 56% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 8 |
Sandgren broke his opponents 10 times with a 29% conversion rate. Sandgren dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Pinnington broke his opponents 15 times with a 60% conversion rate. Pinnington conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded.
| Sandgren | |||||
| Q1 Mccormick |
Q3 Bernard |
R1 Fanselow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-67 | 6-2 7-5 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | 30 | 70 | |
| pts | 70-56 | 73-53 | 97-94 | 240-203 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | 191 | 443 | |
| Winners | 24 | 28 | 40 | 92 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 38% | 41% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 8 | 11 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 5 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 29/61 | 34/56 | 55/93 | 118/210 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 61% | 59% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 24/29 | 28/34 | 40/55 | 92/118 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 82% | 73% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/32 | 12/22 | 17/38 | 52/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 72% | 55% | 45% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 4/14 | 4/13 | 10/34 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | 31% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 | 11 | 15 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 2/3 | 8/11 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 73% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| Pinnington | |||||
| Q1 Leshem |
Q3 Ponwith |
R1 Pospisil |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 27 | 66 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 71-58 | 93-85 | 233-197 | |
| Total points | 123 | 129 | 178 | 430 | |
| Winners | 32 | 21 | 31 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 30% | 33% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 3 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 7 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 28/52 | 44/90 | 114/207 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 54% | 49% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 21/28 | 31/44 | 84/114 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 75% | 70% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 12/24 | 24/46 | 45/93 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 50% | 52% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/12 | 5/7 | 15/25 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 42% | 71% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 9 | 18 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2/4 | 6/9 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 50% | 67% | 52% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Las Vegas Challenger
- Ben SheltonShelton – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-74 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Emilio NavaNava (7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Govind NandaNanda – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Simon CarrCarr (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Evan ZhuZhu – Aidan MayoMayo (6-4 7-69) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Denis KudlaKudla (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Facundo MenaMena (6-1 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Omni KumarKumar (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Maxim VerbovenVerboven (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Steve JohnsonJohnson – Gastao EliasElias (5-7 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Paul JubbJubb (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Denis KudlaKudla (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Alexander CozbinovCozbinov (6-4 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Omni KumarKumar (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Ben SheltonShelton – Valentin VacherotVacherot (6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Vasek PospisilPospisil (6-4 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Evan ZhuZhu – Aidan MayoMayo (6-4 7-6(9)) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-5 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Gabriel DialloDiallo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan ZhuZhu – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Govind NandaNanda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
