Alibek Kachmazov and David Poljak will square off in the qualifications of the Ortisei Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alibek Kachmazov who should win in 3 sets.
Alibek Kachmazov -> 1.52
David Poljak -> 2.39
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Alibek Kachmazov vs. David Poljak
This will be the 2nd time that Alibek Kachmazov and David Poljak fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Kachmazov (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they competed against each other, Kachmazov won 7-6(7) 6-3 in the quarter in Sultan back in March 2022.
Alibek Kachmazov
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-28 | 17-13 | 6-6 | 14-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-31 | 24-14 | 9-6 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2022 | 49-21 | 18-11 | 9-5 | 22-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-20 | 6-8 | 3-6 | 27-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-11 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 336, Alibek got to the qualifications after defeating Marko Topo 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Russian had a good straight sets win against Topo (6-3 6-0). During the match, Kachmazov and Topo scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 336 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Russian was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Kachmazov was unable to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Alibek Kachmazov conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Kachmazov has a solid win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 62% of his matches (93-56). 11-0 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kachmazov has a compiled41-11 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Alibek’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Kazan,Sultan,M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Shymkent.
Kachmazov has an overall 38-16 win-loss record in 2022, 11-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
The Russian has never competed in this tournament before.
David Poljak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 22-22 | 7-4 | 5-5 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2023 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 3-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 39-30 | 6-4 | 8-10 | 25-15 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 38-28 | 15-12 | 12-12 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
| 2020 | 22-13 | 16-7 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 440, Poljak got to the qualifications after defeating Illya Marchenko 7-63 3-6 7-5.
In the qualifications, The Czech defeated Marchenko (7-63 3-6 7-5). During the match Poljak and Marchenko scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 336 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Czech was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
About the serving games, Poljak wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. David Poljak conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Czech’s best result of the year was getting to the final in Sultan.
Poljak has an overall 35-24 win-loss record in 2022, 21-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kachmazov | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 34 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | 0% | 0% |
Both Kachmazov and Poljak played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, David Poljak surrendered 1 set while Alibek Kachmazov hasn’t dropped a set so far. Kachmazov has played 1 set(s) less than Poljak (2 vs 3). Therefore, Kachmazov played 19 games less than Poljak. The Russian scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, Poljak blasted 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kachmazov | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 0% | 0% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 0% |
Kachmazov didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Poljak also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Kachmazov won 0% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Poljak won 0% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kachmazov | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 0% | 0% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Kachmazov hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Alibek had a solid display on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, The Czech hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Czech was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Kachmazov | |||
| Q1 Topo | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Poljak | |||
| Q1 Marchenko | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 3-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Lukas KleinKlein (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Matthias BachingerBachinger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Petr NouzaNouza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Daniel MasurMasur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (2-0) – H2H and prediction