Marius Copil and Andrew Paulson will face off in the qualifications of the Ortisei Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marius Copil who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marius Copil is the pick to win this match.
Marius Copil -> 1.49
Andrew Paulson -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marius Copil vs. Andrew Paulson
There is no head to head record between Marius Copil and Andrew Paulson since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Marius Copil
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8-12 | 0-2 | 0-4 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 17-11 | 9-5 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 28-27 | 5-0 | 9-13 | 11-10 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-19 | 1-3 | 3-7 | 9-4 | 8-3 | 1-2 |
| 2020 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 337, the Romanian reached the qualifications after defeating Jonas Greif 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Copil had a good straight sets win against Greif (6-1 6-3). During the match, Copil and Greif scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 337 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. The Romanian was not very aggressive to strike just winners.
Regarding the service games, Copil couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Marius Copil conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (0) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (0) on the 2nd serve.
Copil has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (284-243). 10-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Copil has a composed 112-61 win-loss record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Marius’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Portimao.
The Romanian has an overall 27-24 win-loss record in 2022, 10-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
Andrew Paulson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2024 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 374 (career-high), the Czech reached the qualifications after beating Denis Istomin 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Paulson had a good straight sets win against Istomin (6-4 6-4). During the match Paulson and Istomin scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 337 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Andrew was not very aggressive do strike just winners.
Talking about serving, Paulson wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Andrew Paulson conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 0% of his first serves in, win 0% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and 0% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Paulson’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M25 Most and M15 Prostejov.
Paulson has a composed 48-24 win-loss record in 2022, 10-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ortisei Challenger
Andrew has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Copil | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 20 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | 0% | 0% |
Both Copil and Paulson played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Copil and Paulson have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Copil played 4 games less than Paulson. Marius scored 0 winners (0% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech managed to score 0 winners (0%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Copil | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | 0% | 0% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | 0% | 0% |
Copil didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Paulson also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Copil won 0% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 0% of the points. On the other side, Paulson won 0% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 0% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Copil | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | 0% | 0% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | 0% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Romanian hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. The Romanian pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, The Czech hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Andrew was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Copil | |||
| Q1 Greif |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | % | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Paulson | |||
| Q1 Istomin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | 0% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | 0% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | 0% | 0% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | 0% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWLLLL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas RosolRosol – Nicolas JarryJarry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Lukas KleinKlein (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip HoranskyHoransky – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Matthias BachingerBachinger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea VavassoriVavassori – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni OradiniOradini – Petr NouzaNouza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sandro KoppKopp – Aldin SetkicSetkic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Daniel MasurMasur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (2-0) – H2H and prediction
