Jack Pinnington Jones and Nathan Ponwith will face off in the qualifications of the Las Vegas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jack Pinnington Jones who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jack Pinnington Jones is the pick to win this match.
Jack Pinnington Jones -> 1.44
Nathan Ponwith -> 2.62
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jack Pinnington Jones vs. Nathan Ponwith
There is no head to head record between Jack Pinnington Jones and Nathan Ponwith since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jack Pinnington Jones
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-9 | 18-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-12 | 9-7 | 8-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-13 | 6-5 | 14-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 524, the Brit reached the qualifications after defeating Edan Leshem 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Leshem (7-5 6-3). During the match, Pinnington Jones scored 69 points vs Leshem’s 54. Jack was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Pinnington Jones recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jack Pinnington Jones lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Pinnington Jones put 65% of his first serves in, winning 76% (32/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. Jack broke Leshem 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Pinnington Jones has a solid win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 61% of his matches (36-23). 5-5 on hard in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pinnington Jones has a compiled11-10 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
Jack’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Jack has an aggregate 15-10 win-loss record in 2022, 5-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Las Vegas Challenger
Pinnington Jones has never competed in this tournament before.
Nathan Ponwith
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 17-23 | 15-18 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-32 | 18-25 | 2-2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-27 | 19-15 | 6-7 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 17-14 | 16-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 540, the American got to the qualifications after beating Michail Pervolarakis 6-3 2-6 6-1.
In the qualifications, Ponwith defeated Pervolarakis (6-3 2-6 6-1). During the match Ponwith scored 91 points vs Pervolarakis’s 83. Ponwith was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Ponwith wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Nathan Ponwith lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Ponwith put 62% of his first serves in, winning 64% (29/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (13/28) on the 2nd serve. Ponwith broke Pervolarakis 6 times after converting 33% of his break points (6/18).
Nathan’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 San Diego,M15 Lakewood and M25 Edwardsville.
Ponwith has an overall 27-23 win-loss record in 2022, 19-14 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pinnington Jones | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 24 |
| Pts | 69-54 | 91-83 |
| Total Points | 123 | 174 |
| Winners | 32 | 29 |
| %Winners | 46% | 32% |
Both Pinnington Jones and Ponwith played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Nathan Ponwith lost 1 set while Jack Pinnington Jones hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Pinnington Jones has played 1 set(s) less than Ponwith (2 vs 3). Therefore, Pinnington Jones played 3 games less than Ponwith. Pinnington Jones scored 32 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Nathan scored 29 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pinnington Jones | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 0 |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 45/73 |
| %1st in | 65% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 29/45 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 13/28 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 46% |
Pinnington Jones managed to score 4 aces . Ponwith didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pinnington Jones won 76% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Ponwith won 64% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pinnington Jones | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 6/18 |
| % Converted | 83% | 33% |
| Conceded | 5 | 10 |
| Saved | 2 | 6 |
| % Saved | 40% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Pinnington Jones broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Pinnington Jones dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded. Nathan broke his opponent 6 times with a 33% conversion rate. Ponwith conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Pinnington Jones | |||
| Q1 Leshem |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 69-54 | 69-54 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/65 | 42/65 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 32/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Ponwith | |||
| Q1 Pervolarakis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
| pts | 91-83 | 91-83 | |
| Total points | 174 | 174 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/73 | 45/73 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 29/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 13/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/18 | 6/18 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWWWW
LLLLLLWLWL
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gastao EliasElias – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alfredo PerezPerez – Ezekiel ClarkClark (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Simon CarrCarr – Donald YoungYoung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Govind NandaNanda – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – Stefan KozlovKozlov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maxim VerbovenVerboven – Brandon HoltHolt (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (1-0) – H2H and prediction
