Kenny de Schepper and Jurgen Briand will square off in the qualifications of the Brest Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 4:00 pm on COURT CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jurgen Briand who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jurgen Briand is the pick to win this match.
Jurgen Briand -> 1.5
Kenny de Schepper -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenny de Schepper vs. Jurgen Briand
There is no head to head record between Kenny de Schepper and Jurgen Briand since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kenny de Schepper
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-17 | 2-1 | 3-6 | 11-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-29 | 7-4 | 8-14 | 12-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-35 | 6-7 | 18-16 | 17-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-24 | 22-8 | 5-5 | 11-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 20-10 | 6-4 | 9-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 345, De Schepper reached the qualifications after defeating Kelsey Stevenson 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kenny had a good straight sets win against Stevenson (6-3 6-2). During the match, de Schepper scored 57 points vs Stevenson’s 31. De Schepper was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, de Schepper scored 7 aces and he was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Kenny de Schepper was very effective on serve to win 89% (33/37) of his 1st serve and 71% (5/7) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. De Schepper broke Stevenson 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
de Schepper has favorable record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (314-280). 14-9 on indoor hard courts in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, de Schepper has a composed 132-98 match record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in Balma.
De Schepper has a composed 37-30 win-loss record in 2022, 14-9 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
Jurgen Briand
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 37-23 | 5-4 | 23-12 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 35-18 | 7-5 | 7-5 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2020 | 13-7 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2019 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406, the French player got to the qualifications after defeating Filip Bergevi 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Jurgen had a good straight sets win against Bergevi (6-4 6-4). During the match Briand scored 60 points vs Bergevi’s 49. The French player was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Briand bagged 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Jurgen Briand was very efficient on serve to win 90% (28/31) of his 1st serve and 65% (13/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jurgen broke Bergevi twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Jurgen’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Prague.
Jurgen has an overall 34-21 win-loss record in 2022, 9-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Brest Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | de Schepper | Briand |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 |
| Pts | 57-31 | 60-49 |
| Total Points | 88 | 109 |
| Winners | 33 | 28 |
| %Winners | 58% | 47% |
Both de Schepper and Briand played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, de Schepper and Briand have played the same amount of sets 2. However, de Schepper played 3 games less than Briand. Kenny scored 33 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, Jurgen struck 28 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | de Schepper | Briand |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 11 |
| 1st in | 37/44 | 31/51 |
| %1st in | 84% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 33/37 | 28/31 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 90% |
| 2nd pts | 5/7 | 13/20 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 65% |
de Schepper bagged 7 aces . Briand struck 11 aces . de Schepper won 89% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Briand won 90% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | de Schepper | Briand |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 2/8 |
| % Converted | 75% | 25% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Kenny broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Kenny pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. The French player broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. Jurgen was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| de Schepper | |||
| Q1 Stevenson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 57-31 | 57-31 | |
| Total points | 88 | 88 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/44 | 37/44 | |
| % 1st in | 84% | 84% | |
| 1st pts | 33/37 | 33/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Briand | |||
| Q1 Bergevi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 60-49 | 60-49 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 31/51 | 31/51 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 28/31 | 28/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/20 | 13/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLWLW
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gilles SimonSimon – Laurent LokoliLokoli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kenny de Schepperde Schepper – Jurgen BriandBriand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Calvin HemeryHemery (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Jelle SelsSels (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martin KrumichKrumich – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
