Dan Added and Cem Ilkel will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Vilnus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cem Ilkel is the pick to win this match.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.48
Dan Added -> 2.57
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Dan Added vs. Cem Ilkel
There is no head to head record between Dan Added and Cem Ilkel since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Dan Added
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-34 | 18-16 | 10-10 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 38-36 | 22-13 | 4-10 | 9-12 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
| 2022 | 57-29 | 26-11 | 5-6 | 19-8 | 1-2 | 6-2 |
| 2021 | 44-29 | 21-11 | 9-10 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 10-0 |
| 2020 | 11-13 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 6-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 325, the French player got to the semifinal after beating Mats Rosenkranz 6-4 6-4, Ricardas Berankis 7-5 7-65 and Lukas Klein 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter, The French player had a good straight sets win against Klein (7-5 6-3). During the match, Added scored 84 points vs Klein’s 77. Added was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about the service games, Added managed to score 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Dan Added lost the serve twice and he saved 14 break points. Furthermore, Added put 61% of his first serves in, winning 70% (42/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (15/38) on the 2nd serve. Added broke Klein 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Added hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 53% of the points he played.
Added has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (197-133). 14-7 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Added has a compiled63-47 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Dan’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Santo Domingo and M25+H Ajaccio.
Dan has an overall 48-27 win-loss record in 2022, 14-7 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnus Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-27 | 7-13 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 33-29 | 6-10 | 0-4 | 27-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-16 | 2-4 | 0-3 | 16-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 38-29 | 17-9 | 13-11 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 13-15 | 2-3 | 1-7 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 416, Ilkel got to the semifinal after beating Tomas Vaise 6-2 6-1, Luca Potenza 6-4 6-0, Matteo Arnaldi 6-3 6-2, Mate Valkusz 7-61 6-72 6-1 and Laurent Lokoli 7-5 6-3.
In the quarter, Cem had a good straight sets win against Lokoli (7-5 6-3). During the match Ilkel scored 66 points vs Lokoli’s 51. Ilkel was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
About the serving games, Ilkel blasted 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Cem Ilkel was very effective on serve to win 75% (21/28) of his 1st serve and 56% (14/25) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Cem broke Lokoli 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cem started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Cem has an aggregate 10-13 win-loss record in 2022, 8-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Added | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 102 |
| Pts | 233-205 | 353-261 |
| Total Points | 438 | 614 |
| Winners | 103 | 113 |
| %Winners | 44% | 32% |
Added played 3 matches while Ilkel competed in 5 matches. Ilkel started his run from the qualifications while Added had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Cem Ilkel dropped 1 set while Dan Added hasn’t lost a set so far. Added has played 5 set(s) less than Ilkel (6 vs 11). Therefore, Added played 36 games less than Ilkel. The French player scored 103 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Cem scored 113 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Added | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 24 |
| Avg per match | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 1st in | 137/225 | 155/282 |
| %1st in | 61% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 103/137 | 113/155 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 43/88 | 75/127 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 59% |
Added managed to score 19 aces (6.3 per match). Ilkel made 24 aces (4.8 per match). Added won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Added | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 26 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 26/46 |
| % Converted | 42% | 57% |
| Conceded | 21 | 13 |
| Saved | 16 | 5 |
| % Saved | 76% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 8 |
Added broke his opponents 10 times with a 42% conversion rate. Added dropped his serve 5 times and he saved 76% of the break points that he conceded. Ilkel broke his opponents 26 times with a 57% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Added | |||||
| R1 Rosenkranz |
R2 Berankis |
1/4 Klein |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 7-65 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 21 | 66 | |
| pts | 69-55 | 80-73 | 84-77 | 233-205 | |
| Total points | 124 | 153 | 161 | 438 | |
| Winners | 29 | 32 | 42 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 40% | 50% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | 7 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 31/50 | 46/77 | 60/98 | 137/225 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 60% | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/31 | 32/46 | 42/60 | 103/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 70% | 70% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 17/31 | 15/38 | 43/88 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 55% | 39% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 50% | 50% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 16 | 21 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/5 | 14/16 | 16 | |
| Saved % | – | 40% | 88% | 43% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Ilkel | |||||||
| Q1 Vaise |
Q3 Potenza |
R1 Arnaldi |
R2 Valkusz |
1/4 Lokoli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 6-0 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-61 6-72 6-1 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 21 | 102 | |
| pts | 67-44 | 57-36 | 57-34 | 106-96 | 66-51 | 353-261 | |
| Total points | 111 | 93 | 91 | 202 | 117 | 614 | |
| Winners | 18 | 21 | 17 | 36 | 21 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 37% | 30% | 34% | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 1 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 24 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 20/45 | 27/46 | 22/36 | 58/102 | 28/53 | 155/282 | |
| % 1st in | 44% | 59% | 61% | 57% | 53% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 18/20 | 21/27 | 17/22 | 36/58 | 21/28 | 113/155 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 78% | 77% | 62% | 75% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | 12/19 | 11/14 | 25/44 | 14/25 | 75/127 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 63% | 79% | 57% | 56% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 26 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 4/5 | 5/11 | 7/10 | 5/7 | 26/46 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 80% | 45% | 70% | 71% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/1 | 5/10 | 0/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 0% | 50% | 0% | 17% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLWW
LLLWLLWLLW Tennis Scores in Vilnus Challenger
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Laurent LokoliLokoli (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dan AddedAdded – Lukas KleinKlein (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Mattia BellucciBellucci – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Laurent LokoliLokoli (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Dan AddedAdded – Lukas KleinKlein (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
