Andrea Collarini and Sumit Nagal will face off in the 2nd round of the Coquimbo 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CANCHA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.76
Andrea Collarini -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andrea Collarini vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Andrea Collarini and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Andrea Collarini
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 45-26 | 0-1 | 45-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 26-32 | 0-3 | 26-28 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-30 | 3-3 | 20-26 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2021 | 25-37 | 0-2 | 25-34 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 10-13 | 0-2 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 229, Andrea reached the 2nd round after beating Daniel Dutra Da Silva 1-6 6-2 7-5.
In the 1st round against Dutra Da Silva, Andrea recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 6-2 7-5). During the match, Collarini scored 96 points vs Dutra Da Silva’s 89. Collarini was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Collarini wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 4 double faults. Andrea Collarini lost the serve 5 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Collarini put 75% of his first serves in, winning 61% (39/64) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Collarini broke Dutra Da Silva 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Collarini has good record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (342-247). 18-21 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Collarini has an aggregate 330-217 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Andrea’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Buenos Aires 2 Challenger and the Vicenza Challenger.
Collarini has a composed 21-25 win-loss record in 2022, 18-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Coquimbo 2 Challenger
Sumit Nagal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 565, the Indian reached the 2nd round after beating Karol Drzewiecki 6-3 6-2, Mirko Martinez 6-1 6-2 and Daniel Altmaier 6-2 7-67.
In the 1st round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Altmaier (6-2 7-67). During the match Nagal scored 74 points vs Altmaier’s 67. Nagal was extremely aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 77% of his first serves in, winning 62% (31/50) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the 2nd serve. Sumit broke Altmaier 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Sumit has an aggregate 16-14 win-loss record in 2022, 15-13 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Collarini | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 3 | 6 |
Tot Games | 27 | 53 |
Pts | 96-89 | 183-129 |
Total Points | 185 | 312 |
Winners | 39 | 74 |
%Winners | 41% | 40% |
Collarini played 1 match while Nagal competed in 3 matches. Nagal started his run from the qualifications while Collarini had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Andrea Collarini conceded 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t dropped a set so far. Collarini has played 3 set(s) less than Nagal (3 vs 6). Therefore, Collarini played 26 games less than Nagal. Collarini scored 39 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal scored 74 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Collarini | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Avg per match | 0 | 0.3 |
1st in | 64/85 | 109/146 |
%1st in | 75% | 75% |
1st pts | 39/64 | 74/109 |
%1st pts | 61% | 68% |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 23/37 |
%2nd pts | 48% | 62% |
Collarini didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nagal made 1 ace (0.3 per match). Collarini won 61% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 68% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Collarini | Nagal |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 14 |
Converted | 6/10 | 14/23 |
% Converted | 60% | 61% |
Conceded | 13 | 6 |
Saved | 8 | 2 |
% Saved | 62% | 33% |
Times Broken | 5 | 4 |
The Argentine broke his opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Collarini lost his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Sumit broke his opponents 14 times with a 61% conversion rate. Sumit conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
Collarini | |||
R1 Dutra Da Silva |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 96-89 | 96-89 | |
Total points | 185 | 185 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 64/85 | 64/85 | |
% 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
1st pts | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
% 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
2nd pts | 10/21 | 10/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 13 | 13 | |
Saved | 8/13 | 8 | |
Saved % | 62% | 62% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Nagal | |||||
Q1 Drzewiecki |
Q3 Martinez |
R1 Altmaier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-2 7-67 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 21 | 53 | |
pts | 55-35 | 54-27 | 74-67 | 183-129 | |
Total points | 90 | 81 | 141 | 312 | |
Winners | 24 | 19 | 31 | 74 | |
%Winners | 44% | 35% | 42% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
1st in | 32/44 | 27/37 | 50/65 | 109/146 | |
% 1st in | 73% | 73% | 77% | 75% | |
1st pts | 24/32 | 19/27 | 31/50 | 74/109 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 70% | 62% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 8/12 | 7/10 | 8/15 | 23/37 | |
% 2nd pts | 67% | 70% | 53% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 6 | 4 | 14 | |
Converted | 4/6 | 6/6 | 4/11 | 14/23 | |
Converted % | 67% | 100% | 36% | 61% | |
Conceded | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 0% | 50% | 33% | 83% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Coquimbo 2 Challenger
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jose Fco. Vidal AzorinFco. Vidal Azorin (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mariano NavoneNavone (5-7 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-4 1-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Matias SotoSoto (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-2) – H2H and prediction