Franco Agamenone and Jakub Paul will square off in the 2nd round of the Coquimbo 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on CANCHA 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Franco Agamenone who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Franco Agamenone is the pick to win this match.
Franco Agamenone -> 1.24
Jakub Paul -> 3.88
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Franco Agamenone vs. Jakub Paul
There is no head to head record between Franco Agamenone and Jakub Paul since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Franco Agamenone
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-31 | 1-4 | 26-23 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-29 | 0-3 | 24-24 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-32 | 6-3 | 26-24 | 3-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 81-23 | 21-5 | 60-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 22-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 162, Agamenone reached the 2nd round after beating Fermin Tenti 7-5 6-0.
In the 1st round, Agamenone had a good straight sets win against Tenti (7-5 6-0). During the match, Agamenone scored 79 points vs Tenti’s 62. Franco was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Agamenone made 2 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Franco Agamenone lost the serve 3 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Agamenone put 59% of his first serves in, winning 63% (22/35) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. The Italian broke Tenti 7 times after converting 44% of his break points (7/16).
Agamenone has a solid win-loss record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (309-182). 19-19 on clay in 2022. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Agamenone has an overall272-159 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Franco’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the Rome 1 Challenger.
Agamenone has a compiled 28-27 win-loss record in 2022, 19-19 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Coquimbo 2 Challenger
Agamenone has never competed in this tournament before.
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44-27 | 15-9 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 501, Jakub got to the 2nd round after defeating Tobias Franco 6-3 6-2, Ignacio Carou 6-1 6-2 and Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 6-2 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Daniel Vallejo (6-2 6-3). During the match Paul scored 58 points vs Daniel Vallejo’s 41. Paul was quite aggressive to blast 22 winners.
About the serving games, Paul was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Jakub Paul lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Paul put 74% of his first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (6/12) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Daniel Vallejo 6 times after converting 75% of his break points (6/8).
Paul’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Monastir.
Paul has a composed 25-25 win-loss record in 2022, 20-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Agamenone | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 49 |
| Pts | 79-62 | 201-144 |
| Total Points | 141 | 345 |
| Winners | 22 | 73 |
| %Winners | 28% | 36% |
Agamenone played 1 match while Paul competed in 3 matches. Paul started his run from the qualifications while Agamenone had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Agamenone has played 4 set(s) less than Paul (2 vs 6). Therefore, Agamenone played 31 games less than Paul. Franco scored 22 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, Jakub blasted 73 winners (36%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Agamenone | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 0.3 |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 112/167 |
| %1st in | 59% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 73/112 |
| %1st pts | 63% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 10/24 | 29/55 |
| %2nd pts | 42% | 53% |
Agamenone managed to score 2 aces . Paul bagged 1 ace (0.3 per match). Agamenone won 63% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Agamenone | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 16 |
| Converted | 7/16 | 16/29 |
| % Converted | 44% | 55% |
| Conceded | 8 | 13 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 63% | 62% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Franco broke his opponent 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Franco surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 63% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponents 16 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
| Agamenone | |||
| R1 Tenti |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 79-62 | 79-62 | |
| Total points | 141 | 141 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 28% | 28% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/59 | 35/59 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 22/35 | 22/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/24 | 10/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Paul | |||||
| Q1 Franco |
Q3 Carou |
R1 Daniel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 6-2 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 | 17 | 49 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 76-53 | 58-41 | 201-144 | |
| Total points | 117 | 129 | 99 | 345 | |
| Winners | 24 | 27 | 22 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | 38% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 38/60 | 40/61 | 34/46 | 112/167 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 66% | 74% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 24/38 | 27/40 | 22/34 | 73/112 | |
| % 1st pts | 63% | 68% | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 11/21 | 6/12 | 29/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 52% | 50% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 6 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 5/14 | 6/8 | 16/29 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 36% | 75% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 7/8 | 0/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 88% | 0% | 121% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWLWWWL
LWWLWWLWLW Tennis Scores in Coquimbo 2 Challenger
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mariano NavoneNavone (5-7 6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Nicolas KickerKicker (6-4 1-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Matias SotoSoto (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Jose Fco. Vidal AzorinFco. Vidal Azorin (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-2) – H2H and prediction
