Kamil Majchrzak and Hamad Medjedovic will square off in the 2nd round of the Busan Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.29
Hamad Medjedovic -> 3.46
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Hamad Medjedovic
This will be the 2nd time that Kamil Majchrzak and Hamad Medjedovic square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Medjedovic (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Medjedovic won 6-4 6-2 in the 1st round in the Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger back in August 2022.
Kamil Majchrzak
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-10 | 16-4 | 30-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 104, Kamil reached the 2nd round after defeating Maximilian Marterer 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Majchrzak had a good straight sets win against Marterer (6-3 6-1). During the match, Majchrzak scored 60 points vs Marterer’s 35. Majchrzak was very aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Majchrzak scored just 1 ace and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Kamil Majchrzak was quite efficient on serve to win 85% (23/27) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Majchrzak broke Marterer 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
Majchrzak has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (327-201). 15-10 on hard in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Majchrzak has a compiled 65-44 record in the last years on hard.
The Pole’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Pune and the Seoul Challenger.
Kamil has a compiled 22-21 win-loss record in 2022, 15-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Busan Challenger
The Pole has never competed in this tournament before.
Hamad Medjedovic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-9 | 1-3 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 48-23 | 10-5 | 22-9 | 11-7 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 12-10 | 28-6 | 6-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 259, Medjedovic reached the 2nd round after defeating Keegan Smith 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Hamad had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-4 7-5). During the match Medjedovic scored 80 points vs Smith’s 67. Medjedovic was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Medjedovic scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Hamad Medjedovic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Medjedovic put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (33/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (10/24) on the 2nd serve. The Serbian broke Smith 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
Hamad’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Antalya,M25 Ulcinj and the Luedenscheid Challenger.
Medjedovic has an aggregate 44-20 win-loss record in 2022, 12-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 |
| Pts | 60-35 | 80-67 |
| Total Points | 95 | 147 |
| Winners | 23 | 33 |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% |
Both Majchrzak and Medjedovic played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Medjedovic have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 6 games less than Medjedovic. The Pole scored 23 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Serbian recorded 33 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 27/43 | 47/71 |
| %1st in | 63% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 33/47 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 10/24 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 42% |
Majchrzak made 1 ace . Medjedovic also bagged 1 ace . Majchrzak won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Medjedovic won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/6 | 5/11 |
| % Converted | 67% | 45% |
| Conceded | 1 | 6 |
| Saved | 1 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
Kamil broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Kamil extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. Hamad broke his opponent 5 times with a 45% conversion rate. Medjedovic conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | |||
| R1 Marterer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 60-35 | 60-35 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 27/43 | 27/43 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 23/27 | 23/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Medjedovic | |||
| R1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 80-67 | 80-67 | |
| Total points | 147 | 147 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 47/71 | 47/71 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 33/47 | 33/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/24 | 10/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/11 | 5/11 | |
| Converted % | 45% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWW
LWLWLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Busan Challenger
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Max PurcellPurcell (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (7-62 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Joris De LooreDe Loore (7-5 2-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- John MillmanMillman – Marek GengelGengel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Christopher O ConnellO Connell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Yunseong ChungChung (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Aleksandar VukicVukic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
