Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Coquimbo 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA CENTRAL. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 2 sets.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.11
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin -> 6.50
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-30 | 7-10 | 19-13 | 5-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-29 | 8-11 | 25-14 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 53-33 | 4-5 | 48-25 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 63-29 | 0-2 | 62-26 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 26-15 | 0-1 | 24-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 87, Martin Etcheverry reached the 2nd round after defeating Diego Fernandez Flores 6-3 6-1.
In the 1st round, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Fernandez Flores (6-3 6-1). During the match, Martin Etcheverry scored 57 points vs Fernandez Flores’s 41. Tomas was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin Etcheverry scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Tomas Martin Etcheverry lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Martin Etcheverry put 74% of his first serves in, winning 76% (26/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (4/12) on the 2nd serve. Tomas broke Fernandez Flores 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Martin Etcheverry has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (261-137). 39-21 on clay in 2022. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin Etcheverry has an aggregate233-113 win-loss record in the last 7 years on clay.
Tomas’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Concepcion 2 Challenger,the Mexico City Challenger and the Perugia Challenger.
Martin Etcheverry has a compiled 44-29 win-loss record in 2022, 39-21 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Coquimbo 2 Challenger
Martin Etcheverry has never competed in this tournament before.
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 7-5 | 1-2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-21 | 0-1 | 28-20 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 61-30 | 3-3 | 58-27 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-15 | 6-9 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2019 | 40-31 | 16-19 | 24-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 513, Jose reached the 2nd round after beating Miguel Fernando Pereira 5-7 6-1 6-1, Lorenzo Gagliardo 2-6 6-0 6-3 and Renzo Olivo 2-6 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round against Olivo, Jose recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 7-5). During the match Fco. Vidal Azorin and Olivo scored the same amount of points (95). However, the world no. 87 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Jose was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
About the serving games, Fco. Vidal Azorin wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin lost the serve 5 times and he saved 11 break points. Furthermore, Fco. Vidal Azorin put 83% of his first serves in, winning 58% (51/88) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Jose broke Olivo 5 times after converting 45% of his break points (5/11).
The Spaniard’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Cairo.
Fco. Vidal Azorin has an overall 28-17 win-loss record in 2022, 28-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Martin Etcheverry | Fco. Vidal Azorin |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
Tot Games | 16 | 78 |
Pts | 57-41 | 279-240 |
Total Points | 98 | 519 |
Winners | 26 | 145 |
%Winners | 46% | 52% |
Martin Etcheverry played 1 match while Fco. Vidal Azorin competed in 3 matches. Fco. Vidal Azorin started his run from the qualifications while Martin Etcheverry had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin surrendered 3 sets while Tomas Martin Etcheverry hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Martin Etcheverry has played 7 set(s) less than Fco. Vidal Azorin (2 vs 9). Therefore, Martin Etcheverry played 62 games less than Fco. Vidal Azorin. The Argentine scored 26 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard blasted 145 winners (52%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Fco. Vidal Azorin |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 1 |
Avg per match | 1 | 0.3 |
1st in | 34/46 | 229/279 |
%1st in | 74% | 82% |
1st pts | 26/34 | 145/229 |
%1st pts | 76% | 63% |
2nd pts | 4/12 | 19/50 |
%2nd pts | 33% | 38% |
Martin Etcheverry blasted 1 ace . Fco. Vidal Azorin also scored 1 ace (0.3 per match). Martin Etcheverry won 76% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Fco. Vidal Azorin won 63% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Fco. Vidal Azorin |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 16 |
Converted | 5/7 | 16/31 |
% Converted | 71% | 52% |
Conceded | 2 | 36 |
Saved | 1 | 26 |
% Saved | 50% | 72% |
Times Broken | 1 | 10 |
Tomas broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Tomas surrendered his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Spaniard broke his opponents 16 times with a 52% conversion rate. Fco. Vidal Azorin conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
Martin Etcheverry | |||
R1 Fernandez Flores | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 57-41 | 57-41 | |
Total points | 98 | 98 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 46% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 34/46 | 34/46 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
1st pts | 26/34 | 26/34 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
% 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Fco. Vidal Azorin | |||||
Q1 Fernando Pereira | Q3 Gagliardo | R1 Olivo | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
Tot Games | 26 | 23 | 29 | 78 | |
pts | 99-74 | 85-71 | 95-95 | 279-240 | |
Total points | 173 | 156 | 190 | 519 | |
Winners | 47 | 47 | 51 | 145 | |
%Winners | 47% | 55% | 54% | 52% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |
1st in | 67/83 | 74/90 | 88/106 | 229/279 | |
% 1st in | 81% | 82% | 83% | 82% | |
1st pts | 47/67 | 47/74 | 51/88 | 145/229 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 64% | 58% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 7/16 | 5/16 | 7/18 | 19/50 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 31% | 39% | 38% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 6 | 5 | 5 | 16 | |
Converted | 6/14 | 5/6 | 5/11 | 16/31 | |
Converted % | 43% | 83% | 45% | 52% | |
Conceded | 8 | 12 | 16 | 36 | |
Saved | 6/8 | 9/12 | 11/16 | 26 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | 69% | 219% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 | 10 |
Tennis Scores in Coquimbo 2 Challenger
- Remy BertolaBertola – Roman Andres BurruchagaAndres Burruchaga (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva (1-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-2 7-67) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Daniel RinconRincon (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Jakub PaulPaul – Adolfo Daniel VallejoDaniel Vallejo (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Jose Fco. Vidal AzorinFco. Vidal Azorin – Renzo OlivoOlivo (2-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico CoriaCoria – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Fermin TentiTenti (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (6-76 7-62 6-1) – See score progression
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Francisco ComesanaComesana (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Mariano NavoneNavone – Juan Bautista TorresBautista Torres (3-6 6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Fermin TentiTenti (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-2 7-6(7)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Jakub PaulPaul (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas KickerKicker – Timofey SkatovSkatov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Mariano NavoneNavone (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jose Fco. Vidal AzorinFco. Vidal Azorin – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (1-2) – H2H and prediction