Terence Atmane and Mark Lajal will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Vilnus Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 17. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Terence Atmane who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Terence Atmane is the pick to win this match.
Terence Atmane -> 1.80
Mark Lajal -> 1.90
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Mark Lajal
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Mark Lajal since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20-19 | 12-8 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 370, Atmane reached the 1st round after defeating Robert Strombachs 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Atmane has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 61% of his matches (92-60). 2-2 on indoor hard courts in 2022. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Atmane has an aggregate2-3 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir.
The French player has an aggregate 59-26 win-loss record in 2022, 2-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Vilnus Challenger
Atmane has never competed in this tournament before.
Mark Lajal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-16 | 8-7 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 25-16 | 5-2 | 16-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 35-12 | 2-6 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 5-7 | 5-4 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 475 (career-high), Mark reached the 1st round after defeating Bogdan Bobrov 6-3 7-5 and Calvin Hemery 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Hemery (6-3 6-4). During the match Lajal scored 67 points vs Hemery’s 52. Mark was exceptionally aggressive to blast 27 winners.
About the serving games, Lajal scored 4 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Mark Lajal was extremely effective on serve to win 79% (27/34) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Mark broke Hemery twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Estonian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
The Estonian’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Heraklion,M15 Monastir and Bigorre.
Lajal has an aggregate 38-18 win-loss record in 2022, 6-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 40 |
| Pts | 102-95 | 132-102 |
| Total Points | 197 | 234 |
| Winners | 44 | 58 |
| %Winners | 43% | 44% |
Atmane played 1 match while Lajal competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Terence Atmane surrendered 1 set while Mark Lajal hasn’t lost a set so far. Atmane has played 1 set(s) less than Lajal (3 vs 4). Therefore, Atmane played 10 games less than Lajal. Terence scored 44 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Lajal made 58 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 4.5 |
| 1st in | 57/89 | 72/114 |
| %1st in | 64% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 44/57 | 58/72 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 12/32 | 26/42 |
| %2nd pts | 38% | 62% |
Atmane made 8 aces . Lajal recorded 9 aces (4.5 per match). Atmane won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 38% of the points. On the other side, Lajal won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 5 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 44% | 63% |
| Conceded | 6 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Atmane broke his opponent 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Terence lost his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. The Estonian broke his opponents 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Lajal conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Atmane | ||||
| Q1 Strombachs |
Q3 Poljak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 26 | 56 | |
| pts | 102-95 | – | 102-95 | |
| Total points | 197 | 0 | 197 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | ||
| %Winners | 43% | 0% | 43% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 57/89 | / | 57/89 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 0% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 44/57 | / | 44/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 0% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/32 | / | 12/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 0% | 38% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | / | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 0% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | ||
| Saved | 3/6 | 0/ | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | ||
| Lajal | ||||
| Q1 Bobrov |
Q3 Hemery |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 19 | 40 | |
| pts | 65-50 | 67-52 | 132-102 | |
| Total points | 115 | 119 | 234 | |
| Winners | 31 | 27 | 58 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/57 | 34/57 | 72/114 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 60% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 31/38 | 27/34 | 58/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 79% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 15/23 | 26/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 65% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 2/5 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 40% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/1 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLLLLWW
LWWWLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Vilnus Challenger
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (6-3 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Tomas MachacMachac (6-3 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nerman FaticFatic – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lukas KleinKlein – Alastair GrayGray (6-3 3-6 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Mirza BasicBasic (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Vilius GaubasGaubas (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laurent LokoliLokoli – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Johan NiklesNikles (3-6 7-65 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zdenek KolarZdenek – David PoljakDavid (6-7(6) 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Mate ValkuszMate – Ernests GulbisErnests (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gianluca MagerMager – Maxime JanvierJanvier (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cem IlkelIlkel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Viktor DurasovicDurasovic – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dan AddedAdded – Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ainius SabaliauskasSabaliauskas – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
